We use the modal can to make general statements about what is possible:

It can be very cold in winter. (= It is sometimes very cold in winter)
You can easily lose your way in the dark. (= People often lose their way in the dark)

We use could as the past tense of can:

It could be very cold in winter. (=Sometimes it was very cold in winter.)
You could lose your way in the dark. (=People often lost their way in the dark)

We use could to show that something is possible in the future, but not certain:

If we don’t hurry we could be late. (=Perhaps/Maybe we will be late)

We use could have to show that something is/was possible now or at some time in the past:

It’s ten o’clock. They could have arrived now.
They could have arrived hours ago.


We use the negative can’t or cannot to show that something is impossible:

That can’t be true.
You cannot be serious.

We use couldn’t/could not to talk about the past:

We knew it could not be true.
He was obviously joking. He could not be serious.


We use can to talk about someone’s skill or general abilities:

She can speak several languages.
He can swim like a fish.
They can’t dance very well.

We use can to talk about the ability to do something at a given time in the present or future:

You can make a lot of money if you are lucky.
Help. I can’t breathe.
They can run but they can’t hide.

We use could to talk about past time:

She could speak several languages.
They couldn’t dance very well.



We use can to ask for permission to do something:

Can I ask a question, please?
Can we go home now?

could is more formal and polite than can:

Could I ask a question please?
Could we go home now?

We use can to give permission:

You can go home now if you like.
You can borrow my pen if you like.

We use can to say that someone has permission to do something:

We can go out whenever we want.
Students can travel free.

Instructions and requests:

We use could you and as a polite way of telling or asking someone to do something:

Could you take a message please?
Could I have my bill please?

can is less polite:

Can you take a message please?

Offers and invitations:

We use can I … to make offers:

Can I help you?
Can I do that for you?

We sometimes say I can ... or I could ... to make an offer:

I can do that for you if you like.
I can give you a lift to the station.




Hi. Team
In the (can or could) you mentioned for permission could is more formal and polite
Ex. Could I ask a aquestion?
But in May or Might section you said (might) is very polite for request
Ex. Might I ask aquestion?
My question is what is the diffrence between these two sentences.
Coud Iask a question?permission
Might l ask a question?request
I think they have the same meaning. Why they are different in your explanation? Thanks alot.

Hello Helan gian,

The meaning is the same - a polite request. 'Might' is more polite and less common than 'could' - that is the difference between the two. 'Might' in this use is rather old-fashioned and quite unusual, I would say.


Best wishes,


The LearnEnglish

In the sentences "you could say", "you could use", "it could mean", does "could" here show possibility in the present? Which could means "may be able to"?

Hi Kirk,

Is the sentence "I am doing as much as I could" grammatical? I don't want to use "as I can" because it's a strong assertion, one that is a guaranteed activity. Rather, I want to project it as a suggestion of what I "can" do because I might not fulfill the promise of doing the activity at every possible opportunity even when I am able to.

Someone said I was wrong as the general rule is to use present tense throughout: "I am doing as much as I can." and "could" is only used for past or some other more obvious contexts.


Thank you

Hello Grey101,

No, I'm afraid the sentence with 'could' is not correct. Although you're right that 'can' can imply more commitment than you want to express, it doesn't necessarily imply 100% commitment in the way you don't want it to. 'can' can imply that you are doing as much as circumstances (which can include your willingness to commit) allow.

Another option would be to change the phrasing. For example, you could say something like 'I'm doing what circumstances allow', though this is rather formal-sounding.

I hope this helps you.

All the best,
The LearnEnglish Team

regarding the usage of "could have pp", it became somehow clear for me its usage in the past sentences but for future, is this sentence correct:
I have made my decision that up to two years later, I could(or should) have learned French language.
my problem root back to the way I was learned the modal verbs, I would always think should or would + have + pp only utilize when something should happen in past but for any reason, not happened or vise versa.
thanks a lot

Hello aria rousta,

Perfect modal verbs can have future meanings but they still need to have a retrospective sense. In other words, they are used with a sense of looking back. I think your example is rather ambiguous and would be clearer if you said 'within two years' or 'before two years pass' rather than 'up to two years later'.

This use of modals is sometimes called the future perfect. 'Will' is the modal verb most often used but other modals are possible, as you say. You can read more about the future perfect here and here.


Best wishes,


The LearnEnglish Team


Pardon me if my following questions seem a bit superfluous, but I would appreciate it if you could confirm my understanding on the following: You mentioned under "Possibility", that could acts as the past tense of can. You then mention under "impossibility" and "ability" that could is used to talk about the past. By this, you simply mean that could serves as the past tense of can under "impossibility" and "ability"?

Also, my second question would be that under "possibility", you mentioned the use of could have to "show that something is/was possible now or at some time in the past". Quoting your example above, I suppose I could simply add a "not", as in "could not have arrived" to mean something is/was impossible, now or at some time in the past, and hence relegate this to be under the "impossibility" section?



Hello Tim,

Each modal verb can represent multiple meanings. For example, 'could' can describe ability in the past:

When I was younger I could run 10km without any trouble.

It can also describe possibility in the present or the future:

The guests could be waiting for us already.

The guests could be here before 6.00.

You need to bear in mind that one modal has several uses/meanings and not try to fit all examples into one use.

This is why the modals section on the site is organised in the way it is, with sections showing different ways to express certain notions (possibility, obligation etc) and sections showing the different uses of certain modals (can, could etc).


The example you give of 'couldn't have' does represent impossibility from the point of view of the speaker. It is a form of deduction: the speaker does not know for sure but is convinced that it is not possible.


Best wishes,


The LearnEnglish Team

Hi Peter,

Thanks for the advice. Actually, I wanted to seek your clarification on the use of "could" to talk about the past, specifically under the sections of Possibility and Impossibility. Under Possibility, I note that Could may act as the past tense of Can. Under Impossibility, you mentioned couldn't/could not is used to "talk about the past" - does this mean that couldn't/could not is acting as the past tense of cannot/can't (e.g. He was obviously joking. He Could Not be serious)?

Thanks once again!