In the square outside the British Library in London is a sculpture of Sir Isaac Newton. Maybe they chose it for the spot because it shows a great scientist at work.

Magazine - Physics


Do the Preparation task first. Then go to Text and read the article (you can also listen to the audio while you read). Next go to Task and do the activity.

Audio icon Download audio 1.98MB (right click & save)


By John Kuti

In the square outside the British Library in London is a sculpture of Sir Isaac Newton – the first man who asked why apples seem always to fall towards the centre of the earth. Maybe they chose it for the spot because it shows a great scientist at work. Actually, it is a critical view of a great scientist, which comes originally from a drawing by William Blake, the romantic poet and artist. Blake wanted to show the limits of science, that it could never understand the beauty and strangeness of nature. The sculpture shows a man crouching down to draw a right-angle on the ground or to measure something he can’t see. Maybe he’s trying to find the direction to the centre of the earth. In Blake’s original you can see strange complicated rocks around Newton that he does not seem interested in studying.

A lot of things in the universe can be measured, but people want to know why they are that size. We know the mass of a quark and the charge on an electron. These are constants. It turns out that these numbers have to be exactly what they are, because if they were different we would not be here. You, me and the physicists, we’re part of the universe. We have to be here to make physics, so physics has to describe a universe where there can be people. Gravity is another problem for physics – because it is everywhere and acts on everything, including space itself. It’s different from other forces like electricity or radiation, because you can’t stop it or turn it off.

Modern physicists still look mostly at things we can’t see. (They think gravity might happen because of something no-one has ever detected called the Higgs boson.) Either very small things in quantum physics or very big things like galaxies. Putting them together is the main problem of modern physics. The universe and space and time described by Einstein and the fuzzy fast-moving little sub-atomic particles and small things that might make them up. If you want to know how the universe began – with a tiny size but very big mass, then you need a theory that fits both together. At the moment, the theory suggests that the things we can see – stars and planets, etc., make up only 5% of the universe. The rest is 25% 'dark matter' and 70% 'dark energy'.

A theory that could explain all that would be a 'theory of everything' – the real laws of nature. There are already suggestions of what it might be. Scientists think that the laws of nature might be rather simple, even though the real world is full of strange and beautifully complicated things. One suggestion is called 'string theory', the idea is that inside every particle there is some energy that is like the string of a musical instrument – the way it vibrates makes a different sort of particle. At the moment they say there are 18 sorts.

Physicists say that string theory needs extra dimensions. There are other directions where energy can get carried away, and other particles which no one has seen. They try to find them in particle accelerators where protons go round in circles in tunnels getting faster and faster until they reach almost exactly the speed of light. The Large Hadron Collider started work in Switzerland in 2008 and in 2012 a particle which is believed to be the Higgs boson was discovered there. There are also still poets and romantics who would prefer to look for nature’s secrets in other places.





This artical gives a lot of knowledge about the subject of physics. However, it doesn't contain quantative measurements and background theory.

Hi, I am a spanish physicist. Higgs boson has been discovered to this day. It was a really important discovery, because it demonstrates the fact that there exist a particle that provides mass to the other elementary particles. In physics it is really important to found experimentally what theory said.

From my point of view, string theory it is only an invention an it will be never proved.

Good article.

I have read the book A Brief History of Time by Prof Howking. It is very challenging to read, but very interesting as well. Although I do believe we can never completely understand the universe, I also think it is totally realistic for us to forever making progress towards the ultimate truth.

I had a very very good physics teacher in high school. He used to do a lot of interesting experiments to demonstrate his points. There was hardly any lesson during which he didn't perform an experiment. Because him, I become very interested in physics. I benefit a lot from it and I think those things can be entertaining as well.

I liked very much this article beacuse I've always been interested in Physics and I think this article shows in an easy and colloquial way some important facts and theories that Physics has.

This article was very nice I liked it so much, I am not a teacher‘s subect however, for those peaple are teaching phisic it is very useful for them.

Wow what a great subject it changed my way of thinking in physics especially modern physics i wanna be a physicist

I find this article interesting. Physics is a knowledge about how the nature operates, that makes human thinking to discover more and more about every thing around us. I believe that in future scientist will find out another worlds.

Physics is an interesting subject to learn and explore, any what Higgs Boson is ? 

hi massod
the scientists wondered about the source of many phenomina and they 've already found the sources except for gravity we don't know how it comes and howw it affects on objects and we cannot turn it off like electicity so they predicted that there are specified particles that causes this phenomenon (gravity) and they now are trying to find this particle in the particle accelerators

Scientists have not said God must exist, but they have said they cannot prove He does not exist. It is not the same...
About the article I must say it is wrong at one point: there is not just one possible value for the universal constants that allows life to grow. Except for that, I liked it very much.