The indefinite pronouns are:


somebody someone something
anybody anyone anything
nobody no one nothing
everybody everyone everything


We use indefinite pronouns to refer to people or things without saying exactly who or what they are. We use pronouns ending in -body or -one for people, and pronouns ending in -thing for things:

Everybody enjoyed the concert.
I opened the door but there was no one at home.
It was a very clear day. We could see everything.

We use a singular verb after an indefinite pronoun:

Everybody loves Sally.
Everything was ready for the party.

When we refer back to an indefinite pronoun we normally use a plural pronoun:

Everybody enjoyed the concert. They stood up and clapped.
I will tell somebody that dinner is ready. They have been waiting a long time.

We can add -'s to an indefinite pronoun to make a possessive.

They were staying in somebody’s house.
Is this anybody’s coat?

We use indefinite pronouns with no- as the subject in negative clauses (not pronouns with any.)

Anybody didn’t come >> Nobody came.

We do not use another negative in a clause with nobody, no one or nothing:

Nobody came.
Nothing happened.

We use else after indefinite pronouns to refer to people or things in addition to the ones we already mentioned.

All the family came, but no one else.
If Michael can’t come we’ll ask somebody else.
So that's eggs, peas and chips. Do you want anything else?




Thanks, the application of indefinite pronouns stays very clear for me.

I'm not sure if it has been mentioned before but there seems to be a slight error on the last question of the first indefinite pronoun question.

It reads: "I've had flu for the past...."
It should read "I've had *the* flu for the past.."


Hi TimW,

In American English, 'the' is used before 'flu' in the way you suggest, but most often it is not in British English. You can see a couple examples of this in the example sentences for the word 'flu' in the Cambridge Dictionary.

Thanks very much, though, for taking the time to tell us about this.

All the best,
The LearnEnglish Team

Dear Sir
This is from your website. I know it is correct but I would like to know the reason.
My question is; So, that's eggs, peas , and chips.
All are plural verbs but why singular subject(that is) Sometimes we say that is all in spoken and in writing. Please let me know the reason.
Andrew int .

can we say like this i.e.; these are eggs,peas,chips
thanks for the reply in advance

Hi sajjakarthik,

As Peter remarks, whether this is correct or not depends on the context. If you are pointing at some eggs, peas and chips and telling someone what they are called in English, or if you were pointing at a piece of abstract art and telling someone what you see in it, this would be correct. But if you're in a restaurant, summarising and order, it would not be correct.

All the best,
The LearnEnglish Team

Hello Andrew international,

The context is always important. This sentence sounds like an order in a restaurant and the 'that is' refers to the person's order. You could rephrase it as 'So your order is eggs, peas and chips'.

This is a common way of summarising orders and requests in shops, restaurants and so on.



The LearnEnglish Team

Kindly explain to me the difference between these two sentences:
I will like to go.
I would like to go.
Can they be interchanged ?

Hi again hawa100,

'will' and 'would are used differently, so in most cases you cannot exchange them without changing the meaning. Please see our will or would page for an explanation.

All the best,
The LearnEnglish Team

Thank you for the answer.
I got it.