Present perfect

Do you know how to use phrases like She's called every day this week, I've broken my leg and Have you ever been to Scotland? Test what you know with interactive exercises and read the explanation to help you.

Look at these examples to see how the present perfect is used.

He's been to ten different countries.
I haven't seen her today.
My phone's run out of battery. Can I use yours?
Have you ever dyed your hair a different colour?

Try this exercise to test your grammar.

Grammar test 1

Present perfect: Grammar test 1

Read the explanation to learn more.

Grammar explanation

We use the present perfect simple (have or has + past participle) to talk about past actions or states which are still connected to the present.

Unfinished time and states

We often use the present perfect to say what we've done in an unfinished time period, such as today, this week, this year, etc., and with expressions such as so far, until now, before, etc.

They've been on holiday twice this year.
We haven't had a lot of positive feedback so far.
I'm sure I've seen that film before.

We also use it to talk about life experiences, as our life is also an unfinished time period. We often use never in negative sentences and ever in questions.

I've worked for six different companies.
He's never won a gold medal.
Have you ever been to Australia?

We also use the present perfect to talk about unfinished states, especially with for, since and how long.

She's wanted to be a police officer since she was a child.
I haven't known him for very long.
How long have you had that phone?

Finished time and states

If we say when something happened, or we feel that that part of our life is finished, we use the past simple.

We visited Russia for the first time in 1992.
I went to three different primary schools.
Before she retired, she worked in several different countries.

We also use the past simple for finished states.

We knew all our neighbours when we were children.
I didn't like bananas for a really long time. Now I love them!

Past actions with a result in the present 

We can use the present perfect to talk about a past action that has a result in the present.

He's broken his leg so he can't go on holiday.
There's been an accident on the main road, so let's take a different route.
They haven't called me, so I don't think they need me today.

Again, if we say when it happened, we use the past simple.

He broke his leg last week so he can't go on holiday.

However, we often use the present perfect with words like just, recently, already, yet and still.

We've recently started going to the gym.
She's already finished season one and now she's watching season two.
Have you checked your emails yet?

Do this exercise to test your grammar again.

Grammar test 2

Present perfect: Grammar test 2

Language level

Do you need to improve your English grammar?
Join thousands of learners from around the world who are improving their English grammar with our online courses.
Average: 5 (1 vote)

Hello HalynaP,

You could use either the past simple or the present perfect in both of the sentences you ask about. If you see the time in which you were working on reports today as finished, then the past simple form would be fine. You could also use the present perfect then, especially if you think of doing three reports as an accomplishment, i.e. something difficult to do or that you didn't expect to achieve today. If you planned to continue working today, then the past simple would not be a good choice, and with the present perfect you could indicate this more clearly by saying 'so far', for example: 'I've written three reports so far today'.

The principle is the same in the second situation. If you don't plan to interview him any more this week, then either form would be correct, and the past simple would be even more likely on Sunday evening since it's clear the week would be over in most situations.

It sounds to me as if you understand the idea here already, but I hope that helps confirm it for you.

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Thank you very much for your answer, Kirk.
Yes, I needed confirmation that I understand the difference between the tenses correctly. Because sometimes in grammar books they say "today, this week, this year" - just use present perfect and that's it.
You helped me a lot.

Profile picture for user aymanme2

Submitted by aymanme2 on Thu, 02/06/2022 - 10:19

Permalink

Hi, sirs.
Hi, moderators.

I came across this sentence:

I 'haven't visited' Sharm for years, so a month ago, I went there with my family.

I think as long as the action, going to Sharm, finished a month ago, the best tense to use is the past perfect, right?

Is using the present perfect OK here?

Hi aymanme2,

Yes, I think the past perfect would express the meaning more precisely and be the better choice. However, I think people do make constructions like this, especially in contexts where accuracy is not strictly important (e.g., informal conversations), since the intended meaning is still clear.

Jonathan

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by evasir72 on Sat, 21/05/2022 - 02:04

Permalink

Hello everyone
I have a question about present perfect tense particularly with the verbs BEEN and GONE. I know the difference between them in positive senteces, but what about in the negative ones? For example is it the same to say " I haven't BEEN to Cancún" and " I haven't GONE to Cancún" ???

Hello evasir72,

Generally speaking, the distinction is the same, with been suggesting a visit and return and gone suggesting that the person has still not come back. However, in informal language in some dialects people occasionally use 'gone' to mean 'visited':

I've never gone to the USA.

I would say this is a non-standard use which is limited to informal use and which many people would consider incorrect.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by Tony1980 on Tue, 26/10/2021 - 20:19

Permalink

Hi team
Thanks for your great efforts you are doing in making students more confident about grammar.

I have seen a ufo when I was in Italy.

I know that the sentence is incorrect
All I want you to do is to please tell me whether I’m correct in my explanation or not about why it is incorrect.
The verb I’ve seen means that I saw it in the past and have a memory of it now so it’s because of this present reference conflicting with the when clause referring to the past that the sentence is not correct. It’s like saying I have a memory of it when I was in Italy the sentence makes no sense .
Best regards
Andi

Hi Tony 1980,

I think you're more or less on the right lines.
'I've seen' is a present form. It describes a present state - memory or knowledge, for example. However, 'when I was' is a past form. It describes a completed historical past time: a time frame which is no longer open. The problem is that there is a conceptual inconsistency in the sentence. The first form tells us that the speaker considers the time frame open (it is still relevant) while the second tells us that the speaker considers the time frame closed.

Peter
The LearnEnglish Team

Hi Peter
In 3 years time I’ll be teaching English in one of my country’s university that’s why I wanted your professional help to tell me if I’m right in the following definitions:

A past event is a hypothetical present event seen from a real present event
perspective.

Since, serves as the starting point of the present perfect and because the starting point of the present perfect refers to the past , since, serves to indicate the past aspect of the present perfect and for this reason it is followed by a past tense.

Best regards
Andi