Robot teachers

Robot teachers

Read an article about robot teachers to practise and improve your reading skills.

Do the preparation task first. Then read the text and do the exercises.

Preparation

Reading text

If you think of the jobs robots could never do, you would probably put doctors and teachers at the top of the list. It's easy to imagine robot cleaners and factory workers, but some jobs need human connection and creativity. But are we underestimating what robots can do? In some cases, they already perform better than doctors at diagnosing illness. Also, some patients might feel more comfortable sharing personal information with a machine than a person. Could there be a place for robots in education after all?

British education expert Anthony Seldon thinks so. And he even has a date for the robot takeover of the classroom: 2027. He predicts robots will do the main job of transferring information and teachers will be like assistants. Intelligent robots will read students' faces, movements and maybe even brain signals. Then they will adapt the information to each student. It's not a popular opinion and it's unlikely robots will ever have empathy and the ability to really connect with humans like another human can.

One thing is certain, though. A robot teacher is better than no teacher at all. In some parts of the world, there aren't enough teachers and 9–16 per cent of children under the age of 14 don't go to school. That problem could be partly solved by robots because they can teach anywhere and won't get stressed, or tired, or move somewhere for an easier, higher-paid job.

Those negative aspects of teaching are something everyone agrees on. Teachers all over the world are leaving because it is a difficult job and they feel overworked. Perhaps the question is not 'Will robots replace teachers?' but 'How can robots help teachers?' Office workers can use software to do things like organise and answer emails, arrange meetings and update calendars. Teachers waste a lot of time doing non-teaching work, including more than 11 hours a week marking homework. If robots could cut the time teachers spend marking homework and writing reports, teachers would have more time and energy for the parts of the job humans do best.

Task 1

Task 2

Discussion

Download

Language level

Average: 4.1 (127 votes)

Submitted by betelf on Mon, 23/10/2023 - 08:37

Permalink

I would like to, even now, I enjoy using AI for learning.

Submitted by TataRyt on Fri, 20/10/2023 - 19:48

Permalink

I am totally sure that robots instead of teachers is a bad idea. Robots can assist with self-learning but on the classes they cannot replace the empathy of teachers. In this case the individual approach to the student is lost.

Submitted by Nhatlinh2k5 on Fri, 29/09/2023 - 03:16

Permalink

I absolutely agree with the idea that teachers in recent times are facing doing non-teaching work. It is very stressful and consumes a great amount of time for teachers.

Submitted by fthbertan on Sun, 06/08/2023 - 20:06

Permalink

I'm not really sure about this. People may be concerned much times if robots can make some critical jobs. Robots can achieve too jobs such as cleaning, factory works, sending mail, arrange meeting, update calendars. But some important jobs can just make it by humans. And then, maybe they can help teacher for various jobs. Some regularly jobs could have made it just by humans before the robots are created .Because Robots can make a job very perfectly but human power ve opinion always preferred by us. I wouldn't want a robot as a teacher, I always prefer to learn from teacher who is human. Because they have thinking skills and they have particular abilities when they graduate from university. That's why, I don't even want to imagine robots teach us a lesson in the classroom.

Submitted by ogzhnbngl on Sun, 11/06/2023 - 18:42

Permalink

I think the question is must be How robots can help teachers? Because in my opinion a robot can't do empathy with a student. If robots could take non-teaching works from shoulders of teachers then teachers can do they'r best. This idea valid for so many job.

Submitted by AlexandraMT on Wed, 07/06/2023 - 14:53

Permalink

Yes, at the moment I use Chatgpt as my research assistant and it helps me a lot. I think people can learn from it

Submitted by Miss zahra on Thu, 06/04/2023 - 22:40

Permalink

I strongly agree to employ robots for assist teachers in the class room but not replacing real teachers. I believed that robots never will ever have empathy and the ability to really connect with humans like another human can so they can help teachers for some tasks that makes teachers overwork.

Submitted by jmajo on Tue, 14/03/2023 - 12:58

Permalink

Maybe in the future when the difference between a robot and a human teacher would be smaller, but I don’t think we’re there yet, not in my country anyway, although I recognise it could be interesting to automatise some parts of the education in order to be less dependent of human teachers, It’s to soon to completely replace human interactions between human teachers and students in the classrooms, but in some areas or careers could be easier to implement robot teachers than others, in my opinion some IT
classes would be better if we have robot teachers instead of humans in the future.

Thanks for the lesson.
Great site!!

Submitted by Eman Samir on Tue, 29/11/2022 - 11:45

Permalink

I think it would be a nice idea if it did some stressful tasks that makes teachers feel overworked such as marking homework and writing reports. For teaching lessons to student, human teachers would be better as they can have empathy and the ability to really connect with students better.

Submitted by Gizem OKUR on Thu, 27/10/2022 - 07:46

Permalink

Yeah definetely ıf ı have such a chance as teacher. ı prefer have a robot who helps me everytime . Because yo know many teachers are overworked and generally they tell complain about that, and who seem so exhausted. ı think the best way might be it.ı think. students might be happy too in this case. because teachers can take care of them so much.