Level: beginner
The past continuous is made from the past tense of the verb be and the –ing form of a verb:
I was |
working etc. |
We use the past continuous to talk about the past:
-
for something which happened before and after another action:
The children were doing their homework when I got home.
Compare: The children did their homework when (= after) I got home.
This use of the past continuous is very common at the beginning of a story:
The other day I was waiting for a bus when …
Last week, as I was driving to work, …
- for something that happened before and after a specific time:
It was eight o'clock. I was writing a letter.
Compare: At eight o'clock I wrote (= started writing) some letters.
- to show that something continued for some time:
My head was aching.
Everyone was shouting.
- for something that happened again and again:
I was practising every day, three times a day.
They were meeting secretly after school.
They were always quarrelling.
- with verbs which show change or growth:
The children were growing up quickly.
Her English was improving.
My hair was going grey.
The town was changing quickly.
We do not normally use the past continuous with stative verbs. We use the past simple instead:
When I got home, I really needed (NOT
was needing) a shower.
- Past continuous
- Past continuous and past simple
Level: intermediate
Past continuous and hypotheses
We can also use the past continuous to refer to the present or future in hypotheses (when we imagine something). See these pages:
Hello,
Could you check this sentence for me please?
I couldn't go out this morning because it was raining the whole morning.
Hello Khangvo2812,
I don't see anything wrong with that sentence. Of course, whether or it is appropriate will depend on the context in which it is used.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
If I understand correctly, it had been raining the whole morning, so I couldn’t go out has a different meaning to my previous sentence?
Hello again Khangvo2812,
Both sentences tell us that you did not go out because of the rain. In most situations that would be the message you would want to convey and so you could use either sentence.
The only difference is that the past progressive form (was raining) suggests that it was still raining when you made the decision and continued to rain, whereas the past perfect progressive (had been raining) tells us only about the situation up to the decision. The past perfect progressive, for example, could mean that the rain had stopped when you made the decision (but everything was still wet). The past perfect progressive does not tell us if the rain continued; it deals only with the time up to the decision. As I said, most of the time this distinction would be irrelevant and you could use either form.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Team,
I got confused between the past simple and past continuous in this situation. What do you say about it?
Here is the sentence: We were late for school because it rained heavily.
Of course, it happened and finished and we were late. But can we use past continuous instead? (We were late for school because it was raining heavily). If yes, how could we make it clearer for others to understand, sir?
Thanks a lot for your help.
Hi anhtuan01995,
Yes, you can use the past continuous. The meaning of the two sentences is similar, but the past continuous emphasises "raining" as having a duration, i.e. going on for some time. The past simple, in comparison, presents "rained" simply as something that happened and finished.
I hope that helps.
Jonathan
LearnEnglish team
It does help me a lot! Thank you for your explanation.
"he doesn't prepared for what's coming." was this sentence wrote correctly?
Hello buggyman94,
No, I'm afraid not. If I understand what you want to say, the correct version is 'He wasn't prepared for what was coming' or 'He hasn't prepared for what's coming' or 'He's not prepared for what's coming'.
Does that make sense?
All the best,
Kirk
LearnEnglish team
No, it wasn't. Because if you want to talk about the past in a negative form, you use didn't + Verb in base form, so, the sentence would be "He didn't prepare for what's coming"
Hi everyone. Is the following sentence grammatically correct? Thank you
“ He was reading a book yesterday at night.”
Hi mr.rm.6656,
Yes, it is! But for "yesterday at night" it would be more usual to say "last night".
Jonathan
LearnEnglish team
Hi, Can you tell me what grade the past progressive tense is introduced?
Hi AnnabelD,
I don't think there's a single answer to this! It may be introduced at various grades, ages or stages, depending on the country, curriculum and textbooks used.
Jonathan
LearnEnglish team
Hi, I have a quick question. Is it correct to say "As the snow was falling, I was staying inside my house and playing the piano."? There are three actions mentioned in this sentence and every one of them is a "long-term" action. But still, I'm not quite sure if I got it right.
Hi _Chris_,
The sentence is not incorrect - it's grammatically fine - but I'm not sure in which context you would use it.
Remember, continuous forms are not about the length of the action but rather the fact that it is in progress in some way relative to another event. You can describe very long-term actions with simple forms: The Roman Empire lasted for almost 1500 years by most counts. However, when one event occurs within the context of another event the continuous is used: The Roman were ruling Britain when Boudica rebelled.
As the sentence is, without any wider context, there is no reason to use continuous forms here.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Team. Could you please help me choose the correct one? Why?
- One day, the boys found a man in the forest. He (had died - was dying).
Thank you.
Hello Ahmed Imam,
Both forms are possible. It depends on whether or not the man was still alive when he was found.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
hi thanks for your answering
i have one question
can we say and is that correct? "i was going to club for 5 month"
or we say...."i have gone to club for 5 month"
which one is correct?and when do we use from these?
Thanks
Hello waza1000,
This depends on the context but I think these are the most likely options:
If you still go to the club: I have been going to the club for 5 months.
If you no longer go to the club: I went to the club for 5 months / I was going to the club for 5 months. [the meaning is the same; was going emphasises that you knew it was a temporary situation]
If you still go to the club: I have been going to the club for 5 months.
I have gone to the club for 5 months is not correct.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
is this correct
when i lived in England, i had taken a course on english grammar
when i had been living in England, i took a course on english grammar
Hello Qirat2004,
It really depends on the situation, but I'm afraid that these are probably not correct. If you are now living somewhere else, lived in England for a time in the past, and took a course on English grammar before you lived in England, you could say, for example: 'Before living in England, I had taken a course on English grammar'.
Does that express what you mean?
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Is it correct to say that while i was living in England i was taking a course: when i lived in England i was taking a course. P.S. i am not living there any more
Hi yyyyyyyy7,
Yes, both of those sentences are correct and they have the meaning that you said.
Using the past continuous (was taking a course) means that the course lasted the whole of the length of your stay in England (i.e., you started living in England when the course started, and you left England when the course ended).
In comparison, if you say While I was living in England, I took a course ("took" = past simple), the course could last the whole of your stay in England, or it could be just one part of your stay.
Jonathan
LearnEnglish team
The first sentence is accurate if.... you no longer live in English but when you did, you had taken a course.
The second sentence doesn't indicate the right timing. The course should be further in the past than living in English....I had been taking a course on English grammar when I was living in England.
Hello!
Could you,please, explain this sentence: 'I was going to meet my friend while it was raining' Can we say that these are two actions in the Past Continous tense, although 'was going to' is future time expressed in the Past?
Hi Nora Kirts,
Yes, I would probably understand the sentence as two past continuous actions. In this sense, "I was going" shows an action in progress (i.e., I was walking, driving or moving in some other way), not future time in the past.
The future time meaning is different. That shows the person's plan or intention, rather than an action in progress. So, it might make sense for the person to say that they were planning to meet the friend while it was raining, but it's a bit unusual (why would they only plan to meet as long as it was raining?).
I hope that helps.
Jonathan
The LearnEnglish Team
Hi breezyabdo,
Both versions are gramatically possible, but only one logically fits the context.
We can use past simple with a past continous form to show an event which happens in the middle of another event:
We can use two past continuous forms when two events occur at the same time and continue:
Now, in your context if you use a past simple (my father read a book) it would suggest that in the time you were watching TV he started and finished a book. It's possible that he's a super-fast reader, or that it is a very short book, but it's more likely that these were two ongoing events rather than one happening entirely during another.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello DaniWeebKage,
You can find our pages on the use of the past perfect here:
https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/english-grammar-reference/perfect-aspect
https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/english-grammar-reference/past-perfect
https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/english-grammar-reference/talking-about-the-past
As you'll see from the information on those pages, we use perfect forms, whether present, past or future, when the earlier event has an influence on the later event. It's not only a question of sequence, but of relevance. If the earlier event affects the later situation in some important way, then we link them using a perfect form.
For example:
You can see from this that the context and intent of the speaker is key.
I won't comment directly on your examples as they contain a few errors and the very 'wear' (rather than 'put on' or 'take') is problematic and would need a very long explanation of a very unlikely context.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello a1981z,
If this is from a test or exercise, 'was talking' is probably the intended answer. This means that they were talking at the same time they were going home -- both actions are happening together.
If the verb were 'talked', it would be odd (though not impossible I think) because the talking happens in the time he was going home, though not during the whole action of going home.
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello shahed dalloul,
In 1, 'was watching' is the correct answer. The actions are simultaneous and when each finishes is not indicated.
In 2, 'will probably' is less certain than 'may well', so I'd say 'will probably' is a better answer since it begins with 'I'm not sure'.
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hi Samin,
The original sentence is a prediction about the future. If you want to maintain that meaning but move the time into the past, then would is the best option:
(I think that ) Anike will win the prize.
(I thought that) Anika would win the prize.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello DaniWeebKage,
The second one is correct as we consider opening a cupboard door to be an instantaneous action. Nothing falls out when the door is shut; things fall out once it is open, not during the process of opening.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Ahmed Imam,
Yes, that's fine. Depending on the situation, 'my mother was cooking' could also be correct.
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Ahmed Imam,
2 focuses on the fact that both actions were happening at the same time. 1 could suggest that you were already reading when your mother started cooking and that she finished before you did.
You can read a little more about the use of these two tenses together on our Past continuous and past simple page.
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Samin,
These sentences represent an opative mood in terms of meaning, but English does not represent this with any particular form. Rather, certain constuctions carry an opative meaning, such as the examples you give.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello AsahiYo20,
You could make the argument that was lying suggests the pen is not normally in that place, while lay suggests the opposite. However, I think in most contexts the two forms can be used interchangeably and it's really more a question of style and speaker preference.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello karina120,
Thank you for the comment. We'll make a note of this for when we next update the page. In the meantime, if you have any questions about how to form the negative or question then we'll be happy to explain, of course.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team