Different uses of 'used to'

Different uses of 'used to'

Do you know the difference between I used to drive on the left and I'm used to driving on the left? Test what you know with interactive exercises and read the explanation to help you.

Look at these examples to see how used to, get used to and be used to are used.

I used to want to be a lawyer but then I realised how hard they work!
How's Boston? Are you used to the cold weather yet?
No matter how many times I fly, I'll never get used to take-off and landing!

Try this exercise to test your grammar.

Grammar test 1

'used to' + infinitive and 'be' or 'get used to' + '-ing': Grammar test 1

Read the explanation to learn more.

Grammar explanation

Used to + infinitive and be/get used to + -ing look similar but they have very different uses.

used to

We use used to + infinitive to talk about a past situation that is no longer true. It tells us that there was a repeated action or state in the past which has now changed.

She used to be a long-distance runner when she was younger.
I didn't use to sleep very well, but then I started doing yoga and it really helps.
Did you use to come here as a child?

be used to and get used to

Be used to means 'be familiar with' or 'be accustomed to'.

She's used to the city now and doesn't get lost any more.
He wasn't used to walking so much and his legs hurt after the hike.
I'm a teacher so I'm used to speaking in public.

We use get used to to talk about the process of becoming familiar with something.  

I'm finding this new job hard but I'm sure I'll get used to it soon.
It took my mother years to get used to living in London after moving from Pakistan.
I'm getting used to the noise now. I found it really stressful when I first moved in.

Be used to and get used to are followed by a noun, pronoun or the -ing form of a verb, and can be used about the past, present or future.

Do this exercise to test your grammar again.

Grammar test 2

'used to' + infinitive and 'be' or 'get used to' + '-ing': Grammar test 2

Language level

Average: 4.1 (173 votes)

Hello Bitbyte,

Yes, that's correct. We use 'used' + infinitive to draw attention to a change in a situation. If we're simply talking about something that happened during a period of time in the past, we generally use past simple. The past simple does not exclude a change in the situation -- in fact, it's quite likely there was a change -- but we are not drawing attention to it in the way that 'used' + infinitive does.

Hope this helps.

Best wishes,
Kirk
LearnEnglish team

Profile picture for user Prakash

Submitted by Prakash on Thu, 07/03/2024 - 08:02

Permalink

Hello,
The British Council,
I am writing to seek clarification on the structure of two specific auxiliaries: "ought" and "used." As an English language enthusiast, I am keen on understanding the proper usage and grammatical structure of these auxiliaries.

Could you please explain the correct structures for the following:

1. Modal auxiliary: "ought"
2. Marginal auxiliary: "used"

I have encountered some confusion regarding the following constructions:

- "used + infinitive with to"
- "ought + infinitive with to"
OR
- "used to + infinitive without to"
- "ought to + infinitive without to"

I would greatly appreciate any insights or explanations you can provide to clarify these structures.
Thank you very much for your assistance.
- KesariSir, India

Hello Kesari-ji,

In all the reference works I am familiar with, these are presented as 'ought' + infinitive with 'to' and 'used' + infinitive with 'to'. 

It's important to note that the grammars I'm referring to are teaching/learning grammars. 

People with specialist interests in grammar may well classify them differently, but I'm afraid I'm not familiar enough with this perspective to say anything useful about it. I expect you could find a discussion of this in the English Language & Usage Stack Exchange.

Hope this helps.

Best wishes,
Kirk
LearnEnglish team

Submitted by Khangvo2812 on Sun, 11/02/2024 - 12:18

Permalink

Hello,
Instead of using past perfect, can I use used to in the sentence below?
Our grandparents had left school before they were fourteen.

Hi Khangvo2812,

No, because "used to" shows a repeated past action or a past state, but not a single past action like "left school". You can read more about "used to" and "would" on our Past habits page - I hope you find it useful.

Jonathan

LearnEnglish team

Submitted by Khangvo2812 on Sun, 11/02/2024 - 12:17

Permalink

Hello,
Instead of using past perfect, can I use would in the sentence below?
Our grandparents had left school before they were fourteen.

Hi Khangvo2812,

No, "would" doesn't make sense here. "Would" shows a repeated past action, but in this sentence "leave school" is a single action.

Jonathan

LearnEnglish team

Submitted by gaby02 on Fri, 29/12/2023 - 08:39

Permalink

Hello, please help me with these sentences! Which one is correct?
1. They’re used to having people help them all the time.
2. They’re used to having people helping them all the time.

Hello gaby02,

Both are possible here and I don't think there's a huge difference in meaning in this case. More generally, the -ing form suggests an action in progress or continued, while the simple form suggests a completed action. For example:

1. He's used to having people check his work.

2. He's used to having people checking his work.

In sentence 1 the suggestion is he works and then it's checked. In sentence 2 the implication is that he works and while he is working someone is checking his work.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team