Look at these examples to see how must, might, may, could and can't can be used.
That must be the main entrance. I can see people queuing to get in.
I've lost my keys. They might be at work or they could be in the car.
You can't be bored already! You've only been here five minutes.
Try this exercise to test your grammar.
- Grammar test 1
Read the explanation to learn more.
Grammar explanation
We can use modal verbs for deduction – guessing if something is true using the available information. The modal verb we choose shows how certain we are about the possibility. This page focuses on making deductions about the present or future.
must
We use must when we feel sure that something is true or it's the only realistic possibility.
This must be her house. I can see her car in the garage.
He must live near here because he always walks to work.
Come inside and get warm. You must be freezing out there!
might, may, could
We use might, may or could to say that we think something is possible but we're not sure.
She's not here yet. She might be stuck in traffic.
He's not answering. He could be in class.
We regret to inform you that some services may be delayed due to the bad weather.
They all have the same meaning, but may is more formal than might and could.
can't
We use can't when we feel sure that something is not possible.
It can't be far now. We've been driving for hours.
She can't know about the complaint. She's promoted him to team leader.
It can't be easy for him, looking after three kids on his own.
Note that these verbs, like all modal verbs, are followed by an infinitive without to.
Do this exercise to test your grammar again.
- Grammar test 2
Hi ShetuYogme,
I'll try my best to clarify!
Actually, in my previous comment, I wrote: "About "you would have enjoyed the party", this particular sentence and context seem more likely to mean an unreal and imagined past action".
My comment was about the use of "would have" in this particular sentence, not about "would have" in general. It also does not say that "would have" cannot be used for a past certainty/prediction, but that instead it would be more common (in my view) for somebody to say this sentence with the conditional meaning. As you can see, I am commenting about real life usage, not just about what is grammatically possible or not.
For He would be at home and Sonam would have enjoyed the movie, I can imagine situations where people would actually say these sentences with the past certainty/probability meaning. But for You would have enjoyed the party, I find it less obvious. I could say that sentence about Sonam because presumably Sonam is not present, so I must predict his views on the movie. But in what actual situation would you tell somebody directly You would have enjoyed the party directly? Why would you not feel so confident about it? Why would you not say something more conversational (e.g. "Did you enjoy the party?")? Again, I'm not saying that it's impossible to say You would have enjoyed the party with the past certainty/probability meaning. I just find it less a likely thing to actually say.
Meaning comes not only from grammar, but from words and context, so you shouldn't think that simply understanding "would have means X" enables you to understand every example of the use of "would have". Since "would have" has various meanings, readers/listeners need to use contextual information (e.g., other things that are said in the rest of the conversation; knowledge of other similar situations) to work out which meaning of "would have" is presently relevant. So, you're right that the Sonam example could be an example of future perfect, instead of a past certainty/probability. But since here we only see the words, and we don't know the context of saying those words, nobody can know for sure which exact meaning is intended. We can only make a guess about the likely meaning, based on our knowledge of other similar situations.
Sorry for the long answer, but I hope at least it explains my previous one!
Jonathan
LearnEnglish team
Hello,
I also have the same views. From my knowledge of conditional sentences, the sentence You would have enjoyed the party is more likely an example of a third conditional. The complete sentence could be: If you had attended the party, you would have enjoyed the party. But I have seen so many people using this sentence not in a conditional sense but about what they think has happened in the past and past certainty. For example, I went to a party of my friends yesterday. My brother didn't go to the party. I came back to my home at night. Now my brother thinks that I enjoyed the party that took place yesterday. So he said to me, "You would have enjoyed the party."
But I have seen no one saying You will have enjoyed the party.
I thank you for the response you gave me clarifying my doubts.
Awesone
If We use a rational process for a deduction, We have to use "must", but When We do not have elements or evidence for a rational process, we have to use "will".
Best regards
Hello again LearnEnglish Team,
I'd like to ask you something more about "must" and "have to". Are both of them used to give advice as in the following sentences "You must take a rest" and "You simply have to get a new job." ? If yes, what's their difference?
Hello DoraX,
In general, we use 'should' to give advice and 'must' or 'have to' more to express obligation.
This doesn't mean that it's never appropriate to use 'must' or 'have to' to give advice, but I'd recommend you be very careful about using them. For example, imagine I say 'You have to see the film!' to a close friend of mine. In the context of our friendship and the conversation we're having, and especially when delivered with an appropriate tone of voice, I can be reasonably sure that he will understand that I'm not actually ordering him to see the film, but rather am suggesting it.
But it could be a real mistake to say the same thing to my boss or to a person I don't know well. They could even feel offended if they misunderstood my intentions. For this reason, it's generally better to use 'should' (which is also appropriate with your close friends).
Does that make sense?
All the best,
Kirk
LearnEnglish team
Absolutely. Thank you, one more time.
Dear Kirk,
LearnEnglish Team.
I have experienced sometimes that when I try to post a comment, it shows "Access Denied" and "You are not authorised to access this page". What is this problem? How can I bypass this problem and post my comments?
Thank you.
Hi ShetuYogme,
As a security measure, the site will log you out if there is no activity (e.g. loading a new page) for a certain period of time. This may happen if you are away from the computer for a while, or if you are writing a long comment, for example. Then you will see this message when you try to post the comment. I'm not exactly sure how long the period is before it logs you out.
Jonathan
LearnEnglish team
Hello LearnEnglish team,
As I was looking for information about the modal "must", I came across the fact that isn’t common for people to speak to each other about necessity by using the word must, according to a grammar reference source. Is this really the case? If a mother wants her child to be back at 10, won't she say "You must be back at 10." ? Or about homework, "Don't laze around! You must finish your homework."? Or in a work environment between an employer and an employee, isn't "must" used?
In the above situations and in similar ones is it natural to use "must" or "have to" is more commonly used to express obligation in conversation?
Hello DoraX,
I wouldn't go too far with this but I think in everyday speech 'have to' is much more common. 'Must' can sound a little more formal. That said, 'must' is perfectly natural and correct as an alternative.
I think part of the issue is that a lot of non-native speakers of English have a similar word to 'must' in their languages and sometimes see 'must' as an equivalent, so end up overusing it. It's not a huge issue, however, and over time as you listen and read you'll pick up these kinds of tendencies. That's really the way to approach it rather than through rules.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team