Emphasis: cleft sentences, inversion and auxiliaries
Look at these examples to see how we use these structures.
What he loves about hiking is that it doesn't feel like exercise.
Not only did she sing at the talent show, she also danced!
I know it may surprise you, but I really do know quite a bit about this.
Try this exercise to test your grammar.
- Grammar test 1
Read the explanation to learn more.
Grammar explanation
We can use different grammatical structures to add emphasis, either to a whole sentence or to highlight one particular part of it.
Cleft sentences
Cleft sentences allow us to emphasise different parts of the sentence, depending on which part is the most important. Cleft sentences are usually introduced by it or by a clause beginning with what.
Cleft sentences beginning with it
Here is a simple sentence with no particular emphasis.
You invited me to the party yesterday.
We can emphasise different elements of this sentence by 'fronting' them, that is, moving them to the front of the sentence after it + be.
It was you who invited me to the party yesterday.
Emphasis: you (not another person)It was yesterday that you invited me to the party.
Emphasis: yesterday (not another time)It was the party that you invited me to yesterday.
Emphasis: the party (not another event)
Cleft sentences beginning with what
What clauses + be are common in spoken English. They emphasise the part of the sentence that is outside the what clause.
What I like best about going to the cinema is talking about the film afterwards.
What drives me up the wall is people talking during the film.
What I found was that the films my friends liked were very different from the ones I liked.
This kind of cleft sentence can also begin with where, why, who, how, etc.
How the kids did this is still unclear to me.
We can also put the what clause at the end of the sentence.
The game we played was what I liked the most.
Inversion with negative adverbials
We can also use inversion to add emphasis. It has a more formal, persuasive and impressive effect.
To invert a sentence, we put the adverbial (e.g. never, rarely, not only, etc.) at the beginning and change the normal position of the subject and the auxiliary verb.
Rarely have I read such an original story.
(I have rarely read such an original story.)
If there is no auxiliary verb, we need to add one.
Not only do they have live reptiles but you can also touch them.
(They not only have live reptiles but you can also touch them.)
Little, no sooner and not
Some other negative words and expressions used like this are little, no sooner, never and not.
Little did I realise that the restaurant was about to close.
(I didn't realise that the restaurant was about to close.)No sooner had we got inside than the concert ended!
Not a single positive comment did I hear from Will.
Emphatic auxiliaries
In spoken English, we often stress the auxiliary verb to add emphasis.
A: Why aren't you coming to my birthday party?
B: I am coming! Who told you I'm not?!
If there is no auxiliary verb, we can use do, does or did to add emphasis. This works in both spoken and written English.
A: I know you weren't keen on the exhibition.
B: I did like some of it. (You thought I didn't like it.)A: Maybe that's why she was so happy.
B: That does make sense, actually. (I hadn't understood why before.)
In British English, do can also be used this way to make a command more emphatic. This sounds quite formal.
Do sit down, please.
Do be quiet!
Do this exercise to test your grammar again.
- Grammar test 2
Hello everyone, I hope I'm in the correct lesson comment section as I've been looking for an answer to an exercise for my masters degree test:
Here's the instruction : "In most lines of the following text, there is one unnecessary word. Correct where necessary, following the given examples."
The text is divided to multiple lines and I only have an issue with these particular lines:
version of the original. What the obsessive note-taker usually LINE 6
postpones learning by understanding till he comes to read in his LINE 7
notes; but as such these are not always the product of LINE 8
understanding, they may be lengthy and unreliable. LINE 9
Normally I went with these answers and the answers between parentheses are what I think are the correct answers :
Line 6 : What. ( No error. )
Line 7: No error.
Line 8 : No error. ( but )
Line 9 : No error.
Any kind of help is appreciated as I wasn't able to get to correction for my test.
Hello AREG,
I'm afraid the team here don't provide checking or correction on the site as our resources and time are limited and we have thousands of users. Some of the other users may comment, however.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Personally, I could not detect any errors in Lines 6 to 9.
Hello, I have a question about Cleft sentence + gerund. example: "It was visiting his great aunt that ...." Is that correct? my prof said it's not correct. We are doing tests to identify costituents in a sentence. But I am not convinced as gerund could have a nominal function. thank you Ester
Hello Ester,
Yes, this is a possible construction. For example:
Was Paul delayed by the party?
No, it was visiting his great aunt that delayed him.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Could you please explain me the meaning of this sentence: No sooner the tickets had gone on sale than they sold out.
Hello Happy Challengee,
This is an example of the use of inversion to make a sentence more emphatic. The 'normal' (i.e. not inverted) structure would be as follows:
The tickets had no sooner gone on sale than they sold out.
In other words, they sold out almost immediately.
As noted on the page above, inversion like this often begins with a negative adverbial expression such as 'no sooner', 'hardly', 'under no circumstances', 'scarcely' etc.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
I've just finished the Elipisis class and a particular sentence in this explanation of "Cleft Sentences with WHAT", caught my attention:
What I found was that the films my friends liked were very different from the ones I liked.
What I found was that the films my friends liked were very different from the ones I did.
I believe it is correct, and if so, why haven't the instructors done it? It's literally a follow up actvitiy to the previous one.
Hello Silas_RB,
It is a correct sentence and elegantly applies the principles of ellipsis to an example with a cleft construction. However, I'm not sure why it would be especially beneficial to add it here. It's simply a rephrasing of the example already here.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello! Could you please help me. As far as I understand, in the sentence “it is he who helped me” we use “he”, not “him”. But if the sentence is like “it is he who she invited for dinner”, is it still “he”, or “him”? Thank you