Look at these examples to see how the past perfect is used.
He couldn't make a sandwich because he'd forgotten to buy bread.
The hotel was full, so I was glad that we'd booked in advance.
My new job wasn't exactly what I’d expected.
Try this exercise to test your grammar.
- Grammar test 1
Read the explanation to learn more.
Grammar explanation
Time up to a point in the past
We use the past perfect simple (had + past participle) to talk about time up to a certain point in the past.
She'd published her first poem by the time she was eight.
We'd finished all the water before we were halfway up the mountain.
Had the parcel arrived when you called yesterday?
Past perfect for the earlier of two past actions
We can use the past perfect to show the order of two past events. The past perfect shows the earlier action and the past simple shows the later action.
When the police arrived, the thief had escaped.
It doesn't matter in which order we say the two events. The following sentence has the same meaning.
The thief had escaped when the police arrived.
Note that if there's only a single event, we don't use the past perfect, even if it happened a long time ago.
The Romans spoke Latin. (NOT
The Romans had spoken Latin.)
Past perfect after before
We can also use before + past perfect to show that an action was not done or was incomplete when the past simple action happened.
They left before I'd spoken to them.
Sadly, the author died before he'd finished the series.
Adverbs
We often use the adverbs already (= 'before the specified time'), still (= as previously), just (= 'a very short time before the specified time'), ever (= 'at any time before the specified time') or never (= 'at no time before the specified time') with the past perfect.
I called his office but he'd already left.
It still hadn't rained at the beginning of May.
I went to visit her when she'd just moved to Berlin.
It was the most beautiful photo I'd ever seen.
Had you ever visited London when you moved there?
I'd never met anyone from California before I met Jim.
Do this exercise to test your grammar again.
- Grammar test 2
Hello boboyogo,
Could you please explain to us what you see the differences in meaning to be? We need to have a better idea of what you're struggling with, as it would take a long time to write a response to your comment as it stands right now.
There are a few grammar explanations I'd ask you to look at first (if you haven't already):
Thanks in advance!
All the best,
Kirk
LearnEnglish team
Dear Mr Kirk,
Thank you very much for your prompt reply.
I would like to know please:
1a) Many people come to the funeral to pay their last respect.
1b) Many people have come to the funeral to pay their last respect.(this is used in the text)
--Why use 'have come' instead of 'come'?
2a) The festival promotes unity.
2b) The festival has promoted unity.
2c) The festival has been promoting unity.
2d) The festival is promoting unity.
---why use 'has promoted ' and not other tenses because all seem to be valid and present for me.
3a) Throughout the years, he changes.
3b) Throughout the years, he is changing.
3c) Throughout the years, he has been changing.
3d) Throughout the years, he has changed.
---why use 'has been changing' and not other tenses? Does 'throughout' hint the use of present perfect simple/continuous as with 'since' and 'for'?
4) Do we always use present/past perfect simple/continuous if the sentence has the word 'since' and 'for' ? If yes, are there any other words that hint that it's a must to use perfect tenses rather than present and past simple/continuous?
Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Boboyogo
Hello Boboyogo,
1a (present simple) is probably a general statement. 1b (present perfect) could be a report on a specific event that's still in progress.
2a, 2b, 2c and 2d can all be valid. It depends on the context.
In 3, 'throughout the years' means from the beginning of those years to the end of those years. Since this statement seems to be about a period of time that includes the present moment and because it talks about a developing situation or person, a present perfect continuous form seems like the best choice. 3d is also possible, but seems to fit less well. 3a and 3b are also possible in very specific contexts, but more unusual.
Re: 4, the present perfect and past perfect are very commonly used with 'since' and 'for', but it's not impossible for other tenses to be used. For example, you could say 'You're losing weight since you started the diet'.
All the best,
Kirk
LearnEnglish team
Dear Sir,
I was going through an article and got stuck.
Could you please elaborate a little why the usage of past perfect (had spewed)would be wrong in this case.To my understanding that event happened first.
Please help 🙏
Thank you!
The arrival of the monsoon did something more than just get rid of the scorching heat.It showed how non- human life forms despite all the heat the universe SPEWED, continued to turn,and change and evolve.
Hello ridhi,
The past perfect would be fine here.
The past perfect would emphasise that the relevant spewing occurred before the arrival of the monsoon. The past simple does not make this clear. It could be that the spewing ended before or with the onset of the monsoon, or it could continue unbroken.
The past perfect is rarely required. It is usually an option used when the author wishes to emphasise a connection of some sort between a past event and an earlier event.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Ohh ok..that means there is no hard and fast rule to use past perfect even if the event happened first,one can ignore and continue in simple past ,it all depends on the speaker/author if he wants to emphasize a connection between two events or not.
Have I understood correctly sir!
Thank you!
(Sorry for the repetitive question sir)
Hello ridhi,
Yes, it sounds as if you've understood correctly. In general, the past perfect is used for emphasis and is not required when talking about events in the past.
There are some occasions when have to use a past perfect form, but they are different. For example, in a third conditional, the past perfect isn't talking about a normal past, it's talking about an unreal/imaginary past event (that hasn't even happened). If we want to talk about an imaginary past event in this way, the past perfect form is necessary. But I don't think that's what you were asking about! I just thought I would mention it.
All the best,
Kirk
LearnEnglish team
Sir!I can't thank u enough! feel so confident for my exams now.
Dear Teachers,
I have a question about past simple/perfect.
Let me write question so that I can understand.
1)When I ____ the letter, I _____ it away.
a) read / had thrown
b) had read / had thrown
c) had read / threw
d) read / threw
e) reading / throw
2) As soon as he _____ his driving test, he _____ a car.
a) passed / brought
b) had passed / bought
c) passes / had bought
d) passed / had bought
e) did passed/ had bought
When I ____(start) my training, I ___(change) my diet completely.
Please in the above question help me to understand. If the answer is b please tell the reason.
Thanks in advance
Hello ismayil175,
In sentences like these where there are two actions we usually have a choice. If we want to show a sequence without any particular connection between the two actions then two past simples are used: I did this after I did that.
However, if the two actions are connected and we want to emphasise the connection, showing for example that one action caused another or had an influence on it, then the past perfect (for the earlier action) and the past simple tend to be used: I did this after I had done that.
Thus, in your sentences, both 1c and 1d are possible, and 2a and 2b are possible.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team