Look at these examples to see how third and mixed conditionals are used.
We would have walked to the top of the mountain if the weather hadn't been so bad.
If we'd moved to Scotland when I was a child, I would have a Scottish accent now.
If she was really my friend, she wouldn't have lied to me.
Try this exercise to test your grammar.
- Grammar test 1
Read the explanation to learn more.
Grammar explanation
Do you know how to use third and mixed conditionals?
Third conditionals and mixed conditionals
Conditionals describe the result of a certain condition. The if clause tells you the condition (If I hadn't been ill) and the main clause tells you the result (I would have gone to the party). The order of the clauses does not change the meaning.
If I hadn't been ill, I would have gone to the party.
I would have gone to the party if I hadn't been ill.
Conditional sentences are often divided into different types.
Third conditional
The third conditional is used to imagine a different past. We imagine a change in a past situation and the different result of that change.
If I had understood the instructions properly, I would have passed the exam.
We wouldn't have got lost if my phone hadn't run out of battery.
In third conditional sentences, the structure is usually: If + past perfect >> would have + past participle.
Mixed conditionals
We can use mixed conditionals when we imagine a past change with a result in the present or a present change with a result in the past.
1. Past/Present
Here's a sentence imagining how a change in a past situation would have a result in the present.
If I hadn't got the job in Tokyo, I wouldn't be with my current partner.
So the structure is: If + past perfect >> would + infinitive.
2. Present/Past
Here's a sentence imagining how a different situation in the present would mean that the past was different as well.
It's really important. If it wasn't, I wouldn't have called you on your holiday.
And the structure is: If + past simple >> would have + past participle.
Do this exercise to test your grammar again.
- Grammar test 2
Dear team,
I've been confuse with would have or could have.
I didn't tell her anything. She would not have liked it.
Can I use could not have as I think it was possible in the past?
Hello HelloThere,
The sentence here is making a prediction about an alternative past and your option are would not have, might not have or may not have.
Could not have would mean that something was not possible rather than something being possible. For example: Paul didn't go to the meeting so he could not have talked to her [talking to her was not possible].
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Thank you sir ,
I've learnt that 'Could have' means past possibilities but 'would have' means imaginary past. But it somehow makes me think they are the same. Past possibilities and imaginary past made me think they are the same.
In this,
He is lucky. He would have hurt himself.
He is lucky. He could have hurt himself.
Is there any way to spot the difference between them?
Hello HelloThere,
In this case, would implies a certain past result if the condition is met:
However, could describes a possibility which is not certain:
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello, team?
May I ask the mixed conditional such as "If I have been eexposed to Covid, what would I do?".
It looks a combination (if + present perfect , S would verb).
Which conditiinal format could be applicable and how to interpret?
Thank you very much 😊
Hi ganecia,
Right, it's a combination of a first conditional "if" clause and a second conditional main clause. Because of this mix of structures, it's unclear how the speaker considers the situation.
That said, I would tentatively interpret it more like a second conditional (i.e., being exposed to Covid is possible but somewhat unlikely to happen), for a few reasons. Firstly, the main clause uses the second conditional form. Secondly, the main clause is also the final thing to be said, which is important because the speaker might have started saying "If I have been exposed ..." but then realised that it sounds relatively sure to happen, and then corrected him/herself by changing mid-sentence to a second conditional to make it seem less sure to happen. Thirdly, by coming at the end of the sentence, the main clause "what would I do?" leads directly into the listener's response, so it may invite the listener to respond using the second conditional too. Fourthly, there is also the general context that Covid is less widespread than it was several years ago, so being exposed to it may be considered somewhat unlikely. But this is all just my guess. The speaker's meaning is unclear so without further information, it's not possible to know what exactly the speaker meant.
I hope that helps!
Jonathan
LearnEnglish team
Hello, could you answer me a Question?
Can I mix first conditional with second conditional like she would help a charity if she wins the lottery, or she will help a charity if she won a charity. I saw the first sentence in an article.
If the two sentences above are grammarly correct, what are the different meanings between them and
she will help a charity if she wins the lottery, and she would help a charity if she won the lottery.
Thank you very much,
Hello Username656602,
Although you might come across such examples from time to time they are certainly non-standard. There is a basic conceptual conflict in that they mix a real situation with an unreal result or vice-versa. There are many possible conditional constructions but they are all consistent in either being about real situations or unreal situations; we do not mix these.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hi,
The answer to the following question is "were"
If my grandmother _____ alive, she would have loved to see me graduate.
Is it right?
Hello picrowcn,
Yes, it is correct. In second conditionals, it is possible to use 'were' for all subjects in the 'if' clause.
Best wishes,
Kirk
LearnEnglish team