London 1: Piece by Piece

How did Shakespeare make it big in London? Find out as actor and producer Ben Crystal explores the places in London where Shakespeare worked.

Transcript

Sometime in the late 1580s a young actor named William Shakespeare left his family and home in rural Stratford-upon-Avon to make his fortune here, 100 miles away in London.  

Over the next 20 years he produced some of the finest poems and plays in the English language.

So what happened here in London to transform the son of a glove maker into one of the world’s greatest writers?

Today London is a global centre for finance, the arts and fashion, and is one of the most diverse cities in the world.

But what was London like when William Shakespeare first arrived here?

Dr Hannah Crawforth: It was obviously a much smaller city. Much of the activity was focused on the City of London, which is now the financial district. The rest of London was not very much developed. The West End didn’t exist, Covent Garden was still a garden, and like modern London it was a very busy, bustling place. There were lots of people coming into the city looking to make a living. It was a very diverse population, lots of immigrants, different social classes living closely together, the very rich to the very poor, and all of these people were hungry for entertainment and particularly the entertainment that the theatre could offer.

The buildings that Shakespeare would have known were destroyed in 1666 in the Great Fire of London, so sadly we can’t see the city as Shakespeare saw it.

Ben: Do you think London was a source of inspiration for Shakespeare?

Hannah: Definitely. I am absolutely sure it inspired Shakespeare. Although he tended to write about faraway places, Athens or Rome, the plays are full of the energy of London, a city that’s a real melting pot of ideas, the centre of political power, and that world I think is the world of Shakespeare’s plays.

In his first decade in London, Shakespeare built up a reputation as one of the country’s most successful playwrights.

But at the end of 1598 Shakespeare’s troop of actors, the Chamberlain’s Men, had a disagreement with the landowner of their theatre in north London.

So in the middle of the night they took the theatre apart, brought the wood, piece by piece, down to the banks of the River Thames, floated every single piece of wood across the water and brought it here to Southwark, an area of London where the land was cheaper, and rebuilt the theatre and called it The Globe.

But today, much of Shakespeare’s London has disappeared. Only the foundations of the original Globe Theatre remain.

Dr Chris Laoutaris: We’re opposite a square which looks quite plain, office blocks and apartment blocks around us, but this is the site of the original Globe Theatre which opened in 1599. This is where this magnificent theatre once stood.

Ben: With the arrival of the Globe Theatre, how did Shakespeare and his actors’ lives change?

Chris: Shakespeare for the first time had some real financial stability behind him. He had a large share in the Globe, so he was earning quite a bit of money by this time, and I think from this foundation of financial security his creativity flourished. During the first six or seven years of the opening of the Globe he produces some of his most memorable plays, including the great tragedies, Hamlet, Othello, King Lear and Macbeth.

Ben: What was their working daily life like here?

Chris: Shakespeare would have been working very hard indeed. Because plays changed very, very often, this meant Shakespeare would have written plays very quickly and under very demanding conditions.

Shakespeare continued his playwriting almost until he died in 1616. But his work lived on thanks to his friends who saved many of his plays in a book now known as the First Folio. 

Discussion

Language level

Upper intermediate: B2

Submitted by Néstor Serrano on Thu, 12/07/2018 - 17:46

Permalink
Could you imagine a group of friends in the middle of the night working hardly but quietly doing this kind of job? To me, is fascinating to do it, obviously, this friends there was a creating a big plan that at the end, it was functioned. The unity makes the power.

Submitted by Djibi on Wed, 28/02/2018 - 12:18

Permalink
Hi I am from Côte d'Ivoire but I am leaving in Paris since 2005. Abidjan, the capital of Côte d'Ivoire is the city which attracts young talents : music, stylist,... Talking about music, they use to say that Abidjan is " la plaque tournante de la musique africaine" I don't know how to say it in english. I would like to leave in an English country for 2 years to improve my english. Best regards.

Submitted by bornasevil on Tue, 24/10/2017 - 16:34

Permalink
I think Jakarta attract everyone who has a dream to become an actor or singer. I wish I could live in another city because my hometown is boring for me.

Submitted by VictoriaNY on Wed, 18/10/2017 - 19:32

Permalink
The buildings that Shakespeare would have known Why here they use this form of time? Why they just don't use Past Simple?

Hello VictoriaNY,

Both 'knew' and 'would have known' are grammatically possible here but there is a difference in meaning. If we use 'knew' then we are talking about a fact - we are saying that we know which buildings these were and are certain about this. If we say 'would have known' then we are speculating - it is a form of prediction (guessing) in the past. Compare:

The place where he went was.... [we know for sure]

The place where he would have gone was... [we do not know but think we have a good idea of what was likely]

 

Best wishes,

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by Rgothardi on Mon, 28/08/2017 - 18:28

Permalink
Probably, the São Paulo city, because it is a very multicultural city. You can see there people from all around the globe. Actually I did live far from my home last year, when I was living in Ireland.

Submitted by Daniel Tranv on Fri, 14/07/2017 - 09:02

Permalink
I would say in my country SaiGon is a city which attracts lots of people to work there. Because many foreign companies, institutions are likely to invest than others cities so that is a great opportunity for people finding a well-paid job. I had left home and working at there for 7 years. Because my hometown does not have any job in the field which I studied.

Submitted by Thu Nyo on Mon, 26/06/2017 - 06:09

Permalink
I did not want to move away from my home, a small village located by a creek. However, I had to move to the capital city, Yangon formerly known as Rangoon, since I passed my matriculation. The village is usually quiet, clean surroundings, planting fields that they are almost smokeless. Sadly, I never been to my home since then except a short visit likely the relatives’ occasions. Hence, one of main reasons the young are moving to the cities is education.

Submitted by Yelin on Sat, 10/06/2017 - 21:17

Permalink
The main cities always attract young talent, because there are more opportunities than the rural areas. But, it has been changing recently, the main cities are quite rough and dangerous, while in the rural areas people are genteel, poor but happy. I would like to live at least one year in another country, to try out other experiences.

Submitted by ioannanioti on Fri, 03/02/2017 - 19:14

Permalink
"The buildings that Shakespeare would have known were destroyed in 1666 in the Great Fire of London¨ we have two action in the past, why we don't say ' ...Shakespeare had known were destroyed....' Idon't realize the use of the word 'would' here.

Hello ionnanioti,

'Would' is used here because there is an element of speculation. We don't know for sure that Shakespeare knew the buildings but we speculate that he did, so 'would have known' is used.

 

Best wishes,

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by Mika on Wed, 01/02/2017 - 19:05

Permalink
it is perfect, shakespere´s groups rebuilt the globe. it like me.

Submitted by anton81 on Tue, 10/01/2017 - 05:50

Permalink
Hello, everyone!I have a question.Chris says 'Shakespeare would have been working very hard indeed.' Does in this context 'would have been working' mean habitual course of actions in the past(for exammple as in 'used to' construction ) or is it a hypothesis? Thanks in advance.

Hello anton81,

The form 'would have been -ing' here is not a hypothetical form, but a description of the speaker's expectations about the past, based on what would be normal and typical or habitual for that time.

 

Best wishes,

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Online courses
Learn English online – with the world's English experts