Conditionals: third and mixed

Conditionals: third and mixed

Do you know how to use third conditionals and mixed conditionals? Test what you know with interactive exercises and read the explanation to help you.

Look at these examples to see how third and mixed conditionals are used.

We would have walked to the top of the mountain if the weather hadn't been so bad.
If we'd moved to Scotland when I was a child, I would have a Scottish accent now.
If she was really my friend, she wouldn't have lied to me.

Try this exercise to test your grammar.

Grammar test 1

Conditionals 2: Grammar test 1

Read the explanation to learn more.

Grammar explanation

Do you know how to use third and mixed conditionals?

Third conditionals and mixed conditionals

Conditionals describe the result of a certain condition. The if clause tells you the condition (If I hadn't been ill) and the main clause tells you the result (I would have gone to the party). The order of the clauses does not change the meaning.

If I hadn't been ill, I would have gone to the party.
I would have gone to the party if I hadn't been ill.

Conditional sentences are often divided into different types.

Third conditional

The third conditional is used to imagine a different past. We imagine a change in a past situation and the different result of that change.

If I had understood the instructions properly, I would have passed the exam.
We wouldn't have got lost if my phone hadn't run out of battery.

In third conditional sentences, the structure is usually: If + past perfect >> would have + past participle.

Mixed conditionals

We can use mixed conditionals when we imagine a past change with a result in the present or a present change with a result in the past.

1. Past/Present 

Here's a sentence imagining how a change in a past situation would have a result in the present.

If I hadn't got the job in Tokyo, I wouldn't be with my current partner.

So the structure is: If + past perfect >> would + infinitive.

2. Present/Past

Here's a sentence imagining how a different situation in the present would mean that the past was different as well.

It's really important. If it wasn't, I wouldn't have called you on your holiday.

And the structure is: If + past simple >> would have + past participle.

Do this exercise to test your grammar again.

Grammar test 2

Conditionals 2: Grammar test 2

Average: 4.2 (109 votes)
Do you need to improve your English grammar?
Join thousands of learners from around the world who are improving their English grammar with our online courses.

Submitted by rosario70 on Mon, 17/06/2019 - 09:51

Permalink
Hi teachers, i would like to ask you two questions. 1) you would not have won the gold medal unless you (had worked out) work out hard. May i use the presente tense. 2) if i had waited for further ten minutes i would have met him. In this second one i was wondering if it was a most informal way to use in the speaking skill so that i may be fluent and fast. Thanks in advance.

Hello rosario70

In 1, the only tnese that is grammatically correct for that verb is a past perfect form. I'd recommend: 'You wouldn't have won the gold medal if you hadn't worked out hard.'

In 2, 'would have met' is the only correct form. In informal speaking,we usually use contractions and short forms to speak more quickly: 'I would've met him' (pronounced /aɪ wʊdəv mɛtɪm/) or even 'I'd've met him' (pronounced /aɪdəv mɛtɪm/).

All the best

Kirk

The LearnEnglish Team

Profile picture for user Ahmed Imam

Submitted by Ahmed Imam on Wed, 12/06/2019 - 17:59

Permalink
Hello. Today, We had a discussion group about conditionals and we had different opinions about the following sentence: - If you are a well-organised person, you manage, will manage your time. Some teachers say that "manage" is the only correct answer while others and I didn't agree with them as we thought that "will manage" is equally correct especially there was no more context. Please, which one is correct? Thank you.

Hello Ahmed Imam,
Both 'manage' and 'will manage' are grammatically correct, but there is a difference in use.

If you say 'manage' then you are making a general comment - saying something that is always true. The sentence effectively means this is what all well-organised people do.

We use 'will manage' in two ways. The most common is to talk about a particular situation in the future: if you are a well-organised person then you will manage your time [this weekend/at college/so you can spend time with us etc]

Another use is 'will' as a sign of expectation. In this case, the speaker would be saying if you are a well-organised person then you will probably manage your time well.

 

I hope that helps to clarify it for you.

 

Peter
The LearnEnglish Team

Profile picture for user Ahmed Imam

Submitted by Ahmed Imam on Fri, 07/06/2019 - 05:47

Permalink
Hello, everyone. In the following sentence, we cannot use "when" instead of "if", right? - If you answer this question right, you have a good brain. I have been searching to get more examples to understand it but in vain. Could you please give some more examples of when I can use "if" not "when"? Thank you
Hello Ahmed Imam, We use 'if' when something is not certain and 'when' when there is no doubt. For exampele: > If you see Susan, say hello to her from me. > When you see Susan, say hello to her from me. In the first sentence, the speaker does not know if the person will see Susan or not. In the second sentence, the speaker knows for sure that the person will see Susan. ~ In your example, 'when' does not make sense as the question acts as a test. If we were 100% sure that the person will answer the question correctly, then we could already say they have a good brain and not wait for their answer. ~ Peter The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by Risa warysha on Tue, 28/05/2019 - 03:03

Permalink
Hi sir. Please, tell me the difference between these two sentences. Even if England were to win ... Even if England won.... Those are second conditional examples. When we have to use simple-past verb n were to infinitive Thank you,
Profile picture for user Peter M.

Submitted by Peter M. on Tue, 28/05/2019 - 06:17

In reply to by Risa warysha

Permalink
Hi Risa warysha, Both forms describe can describe unlikely events, with [if... were to] being a little more formal. However, [if + were to] cannot be used to describe impossible or imaginary situations: > If he offered you money, would you accept = correct (unlikely future) > If he were to offer you money, would you accept = correct (unlikely future) > If I had three heads, I would spent a lot on hats = correct (imaginary situation) > If I were to have three heads, I would spent a lot on hats = not correct (imaginary situation) ~ Peter The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by JessicaAw on Thu, 09/05/2019 - 10:41

Permalink
hi teacher, Can you please help me, I can't decide which is correct. (a) She would not talk to you if she was/ were mad at you. (b) You know if David wasn’t/weren't so clumsy, he would not have so many accidents. Many thanks for your kind response.
Hi JessicaAw, Both 'was' and 'were' are possible in each sentence. 'Were' used to be expected in such sentences, but languages change over time and in modern English both forms are commonly used. ~ Peter The LearnEnglish Team