Pronouns

Pronouns are words that take the place of nouns. We often use them to avoid repeating the nouns that they refer to. Pronouns have different forms for the different ways we use them. 

Read clear grammar explanations and example sentences to help you understand how pronouns are used. Then, put your grammar knowledge into practice by doing the exercises.  

Choose a topic and start improving your English grammar today. 
 

Take your language skills and your career to the next level
Get unlimited access to our self-study courses for only £5.99/month.

Submitted by SonuKumar on Sat, 02/09/2017 - 07:39

Permalink
It will cost much to the one whoever wearing a red dress or in a red dress dances with a girl in my fair. Sir, is this a right sentence ? if not then Could you please make a right one for me. I want to say that Anyone in a red dress, if dances with a girl in my fair, it will cost much to him.

Submitted by Pavan Kaur on Thu, 31/08/2017 - 16:08

Permalink
Hello Sir I have two questions to ask you. 1) What is the past tense of beat and how is it used and pronounced? 2)What is the difference between Present Perfect Tense and Present Perfect Continuous Tense?----I follow Wren & Martin for all my english grammar. It says that both the tenses are used for an action which began at sometime in the past and is still continuing. Eg. I have known him for a long time.---Present Perfect Tense They have been playing since 4 o'clock.----Present Perfect Continuous Tense How does one know where to use the Perfect Tense or Perfect Continuous tense?

Submitted by Peter M. on Fri, 01/09/2017 - 08:40

In reply to by Pavan Kaur

Permalink

Hello Pavan Kaur,

The past tense of 'beat' is 'beat' - it is an irregular verb. The pronunication is the same for the present and past forms. For pronunciation I recommend an online dictionary which has an example you can listen to, such as this one.

We have several pages dealing with the use of the present perfect simple and continuous. Please take a look at the pages below - I think they will help clarify the issue.

present perfect simple and continuous

present perfect

perfective aspect

 

Best wishes,

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by SonuKumar on Sat, 26/08/2017 - 12:35

Permalink
I will never love T.V as much as I love Radio Could I also make this sentence like this using 'as much as' - I Will never have as much love for T.V as (I have) for Radio and Could I also leave the words like (I have or I love) In both sentences ?

Hello SonuKumar,

Yes, all the versions are correct. The one that sounds most natural to me is the first one.

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Hello Peter Thank you for a quick response. My doubt for "beat" is clarified, thank you for the same. For my doubts on the tenses, I checked the links you sent and also took some exercises (by the way "taking exercises" is correct OR "doing exercises"?) 1) I have worked here for thirty years. 2) I have been working here for thirty years. In the above examples, the 2nd example is used when you want to say that you worked there for thirty years and are still continuing to work there. Under what scenario does one use the 1st example? Does the speaker still continue to work there? I mean to ask--I have worked here for thirty years----what does this statement imply--continuity/non continuity of action?

Hello Pavan Kaur,

Both sentences here describe an action which continues up to the present. The continous form suggests that the action is not complete - that the person will continue working at the place into the future for some time. The simple form does not tell us this. It does not mean that the speaker will no longer work at the place - they may or may not. Rather, it describes the period of time up to the moment of speaking without reference to the future. It focuses on the achievement (30 years of work) rather than the process of how that came about.

The distinction is a subtle one and can be made clearer with another example:

I've painted the kitchen.

I've been painting the kitchen.

The first sentence tells us about the achievement, and we are to understand that the kitchen is now painted.

The second sentence does not strictly tell us whether or not the kitchen is fully painted. It may be or it may not be - though most would guess that it is not finished as the speaker chose not to use a simple form. Rather, it focuses on the activity of painting. The speaker is more interested in how they look as a result (covered in paint) or how they feel (exhausted), or in explaining why they didn't do something else (go shopping, watch a film etc).

Very often both the present perfect simple and continuous can be used to describe a given situation. The choice tells us more about how the speaker sees the situation and what the speaker chooses to emphasise than anything objective about the situation.

 

Best wishes,

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by amrita_enakshi on Wed, 16/08/2017 - 15:39

Permalink
Hello sir, can you please tell me if an adjective can be used interchangeably with a determiner? Example sentence: There is 'a lot of' sense in what you say. Here can 'a lot of' be said to be an adjective of quantity or is it only a determiner?

Submitted by Ahmandy on Mon, 14/08/2017 - 16:06

Permalink
Is there anyway that I can see which questions I got wrong or right?

Hello Ahmandy,

In our exercises, if you complete at least one of the questions, you can then click or press the Finish button. This will show you which answers are correct and which are not. Then you can click on the See Answers button to see the correct answers.

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Hello youngdll,

We're happy to try to help you if you ask us a specific question.

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by SonuKumar on Fri, 11/08/2017 - 06:55

Permalink
Sir, Most of the times when you listen that song on radio, that is made to play by me or (made played by me) what should I use here and Could I also say "That get played or have played by me" "that get to or have to play by me" ?

Hello SonuKumar,

I think most people would typically say 'the song that I played'. The context makes it clear that you didn't perform the sing by singing and playing instruments.

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by amrita_enakshi on Mon, 07/08/2017 - 06:21

Permalink
Hello sir , I have a query regarding a prepositional phrase, 'in front'. Sir shouldn't we say 'look in front' rather than 'look front' ? For example : Look in front , join your hands and start the prayer.

Hello amrita_enakshi,

It's not completely clear to me what is meant here, but yes, I'd probably say 'in front' or 'in front of you' and not 'front'.

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by SonuKumar on Thu, 03/08/2017 - 05:32

Permalink
Sir, A king took sonu's bag and gave him his own bag. Now I think here 'his own bag' refers to The king's own bag doesn't it ? and is it necessary to put 'own' in this sentence ?

Hello SonuKumar,

That's correct, it refers to the king's bag. If you said 'his' instead of 'his own', this would be less clear.

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by SonuKumar on Thu, 20/07/2017 - 11:33

Permalink
Sir, There was a king and probably who used to go to a slum area or who probably went to slum area, Now Could I also say that He probably would go to slum area ? which should probably be the rule of showing probability in the past for would. is it ? There's a king who probably goes to a slum area. Could I also say that who would probably go to a slum area ? which should possibly be the rule of showing probability for would in the present is it ? and yes, in both examples if they are right, so is it necessary to use 'Probably' ?

Submitted by SonuKumar on Mon, 17/07/2017 - 17:01

Permalink
Sir, I'm little confused, His leg broke on the road in a car accident, Could I write it like this or Could I write it only like this- He broke his leg on the road in a car accident ? I wrote my first sentence like that because his leg broke accidentally, not he knowingly broke his leg ?

Hello SonuKumar,

The most natural way to say this is:

He broke his leg in a car accident.

In most contexts 'on the road' could be assumed because, generally, cars drive on roads.

The other sentence is not incorrect but is a less common way to say the same thing.

 

Best wishes,

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by SonuKumar on Mon, 17/07/2017 - 08:56

Permalink
So, Could I say to my friends "let's go to the photo studio to have our photos taken ? and are there any other options as well ? what are they ?

Hello SonuKumar,

Yes, that is grammatically correct and natural-sounding. There are almost always other ways to communicate the same idea, for example 'Let's go get our photos taken', which is really the same structure.

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by SonuKumar on Sun, 16/07/2017 - 05:50

Permalink
Sir, Could you please tell me which verb do you use when you go to Photoshop to have some photos, Because when we go to Photoshop ? We do not photograph ourselves, but we get ourselves photographed by someone else.

Hello SonuKumar,

We would most likely use a causative form:

I had my photo taken (for a passport etc.)

 

Best wishes,

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by SonuKumar on Sat, 15/07/2017 - 06:49

Permalink
All right Sir, I will keep it in mind now, Thank you.

Submitted by SonuKumar on Fri, 14/07/2017 - 08:03

Permalink
Sir, "I play in the ground" "I play in the ground in India near Delhi" "I play in a ground in India" Now, is the third one with a ground right sentence and where should we use a with ground ?

Submitted by SonuKumar on Wed, 12/07/2017 - 13:40

Permalink
Sir, "I play in the ground" "I play in the ground in India near Delhi" "I play in a ground in India" Now is the third one with a ground a right sentence or not and where should we use a with ground ?

Submitted by SonuKumar on Fri, 14/07/2017 - 07:16

In reply to by SonuKumar

Permalink
Sir, please check it out.

Hello SonuKumar,

We do occasionally help our users with a specific problem in a specific sentence, but don't really provide the service of correcting users' texts, which is essentially what you're asking us to do here and in many of your comments. In this particular case, none of the sentences sound natural to me and explaining why would take quite a bit of time. It's not that we don't want to help you, but there are many other users who have questions that are directly about our site, plus all the other work that we do that you don't see.

So when we can answer your comments without needing to make extensive explanations, we'll be happy to do so, but otherwise I'm afraid we may not be able to get to them. You could always try to take a British Council class, where a teacher would be able to provide this kind of service better than we can.

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by SonuKumar on Wed, 12/07/2017 - 13:35

Permalink
Sir, My Dad is planning to buy a mobile, and asks me to choose one of the given options and I just simply say "Dad, which should be brought it depends on you". Now Could I also say it in these manners... "Dad, which is to be brought depends on you" "Dad, which to be brought depends on you" "Dad, which to bring depends on you" which is right and acceptable and one last question is it optional to apply "It" in this sentence or not like-(Dad, which is to be brought 'it' depends on you" please help.

Hello SonuKumar,

While '...depends on you' is correct it is not the way we would express the idea in this context as it sounds rather too formal. We would say 'It's up to you which one you bring' or 'Which one you bring is up to you'.

 

Best wishes,

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by SonuKumar on Sun, 02/07/2017 - 02:38

Permalink
Sir, I just say to my brother that something never exists. Now I want to say the same thing for the past, so what would be a better options for me ? "Something never exited or Something had never exited" I think first sentence should be right, Because When we talk about longer-happening or never-happening things in the past, So we should use past simple tense, Because Past perfect 'I think' should be used for one-time-compelete-happening in the past' right ? and is there any other thing what 'you think' I should know about past simple and past perfect please let me know. I'd be very grateful to you.

Hello SonuKumar,

We use verb tenses in accordance with the context and the meaning we choose to express, and I don't know enough about either in this case to be able to answer your question fully without going into a long explanation. We don't provide this kind of service, I'm afraid. But in general, yes, it sounds to me as if the past simple would be the best choice for what you describe.

I trust you've already used our Search facility to look for pages on this topic, but in case you haven't, I'd recommend our talking about the past page and the video on this Word on the Street page.

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by amrita_enakshi on Thu, 22/06/2017 - 13:26

Permalink
Thank you so much Sir. I know I keep bothering but I would like to write impeccable English. So sir could you please be kind enough to help me with the following sentences: •Look there , that is an elephant. •Look there , it is an elephant. Is 'that' a demonstrative determiner and 'it' a pronoun or 'that'and 'it' are both determiners.

Submitted by amrita_enakshi on Thu, 22/06/2017 - 13:18

Permalink
Thank you so much Sir. I know I keep bothering but I would like to write impeccable English. So sir could please be kind enough to help me with the following sentences: •Look there , that is an elephant. •Look there , it is an elephant. Is 'that' a demonstrative determiner and 'it' a pronoun or 'that'and 'it' are both determiners.

Submitted by amrita_enakshi on Thu, 22/06/2017 - 07:03

Permalink
Sir , I have a confusion with the tense order of these sentences: They are supposed to be written in past tense or past continuous. •She said that they were moving (move) to Canada soon. •Did you know (know)where Vijay lives? He said he was coming (come) back home today.

Hello Amrita,

The verb forms in those sentences are all correct. 'were moving' and 'was coming' are past continuous and 'did ... know' is past simple. Well done!

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by Imran 26 on Tue, 13/06/2017 - 10:43

Permalink
Dear Sir, Kindly let me know about Diphthongs & Vowel, citing with their difference.

Hello Imran 26,

This is a difficult thing to explain well in writing, but briefly a diphthong is a sound produced by combining two or more vowels. To learn more, I'd recommend you take a look at the BBC's The Sounds of English page, where there are lots of videos that demonstrate the sounds. Start with one of the vowels pages and I expect this difference will be explained in more detail.

Good luck!

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by SonuKumar on Sun, 04/06/2017 - 09:57

Permalink
Sir, Sometimes I get confused badly when I see the addictive more with the and it is used double in two sentences with The like- "The more money they have the more they want" or "The more you read the more You will be familiar with the spellings of English words" Now The problem is that I think these sentences could be made like this as well- "They want as much money as they have" or "You will be familiar with the spellings of English words as much as you read" Is it right ? And I also think that the same thing can't be applied if two comparative adjective are unlike like the harder and the earlier unlike the more and the more is it right ? and can it always be done with "the more and the more" I mean is "the more and the more interchangeable with as much as" always ?

Hello SonuKumar,

The meaning here is a little different to what you suggest.

The more they have, the more they want means that they are never satisfied. More money just makes them more greedy.

The more you read the more you will be familiar with the spelling of English words means that reading always improves your knowledge of this; increasing reading increases knowledge.

 

Best wishes,

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by Dennis.Nov on Sat, 03/06/2017 - 18:52

Permalink
Hello, Mr. Kirk! Could you tell me please how I can say the phrase: "I would hate for her to have to go there." in British English? In American English, the invinitive construction with the preposition "for" may follow such verbs as "Hate", "Like" and some others. But in British English, this construction "for her to have to go" cannot be replaced after the verbs "hate" and "like" in a sentence. In British English, these verbs may have "Complex Object" after themselves, but not such an infinitive construction as "for her to have to go". So... In American English, it sounds like: "I would hate for her to have to go there". What about British? "I would hate her to have to go there"? Or maybe "I wouldn't want her to have to go there"? Or some another option? Tell me please where I'm wrong.

Hello Dennis.Nov,

I am from the UK and I can tell you that it's perfectly fine to form a sentence like 'I would hate for her to have to go there' in British English. It is quite a formal construction but in no way incorrect.

 

Best wishes,

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Hello, Peter! Thanks a lot for your answer to my question. So... Can the verbs "hate" and "like" really have such infinitive constructions with the preposition "for" in British English? What about this sentence: "They would hate for me to have to stay home tomorrow"? Is this correct, but it just sounds formal? How can I say this in an informal way? "They would hate me to have to stay home tomorrow?". Right?

Hello Dennis.Nov,

That sentence is perfectly fine, yes, and it is quite formal as you say. I think the most common way to say this in a less formal way would be to use a conditional form:

Formal: They would hate for me to have to stay home tomorrow.

Less formal: They would hate it if I had to stay home tomorrow.

 

Best wishes,

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by SonuKumar on Sat, 03/06/2017 - 06:10

Permalink
Sir, what is the difference between as to and as for, and related to and relating to ?

Hello SonuKumar,

Could you please first search for information about this in the dictionary or on the internet? Then explain to us what you understand (or don't understand), and we can help you with that.

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by Ellenna on Thu, 01/06/2017 - 07:35

Permalink
Hello. Could you please tell me whether I can use the preposition "on" with the words "chair" or "seat". Can I say: "He is sitting on the chair", or it must be "in the chair"? Thanks in advance.