You are here

Past perfect

Do you know how to use phrases like They'd finished the project by March or Had you finished work when I called?

Look at these examples to see how the past perfect is used.

He couldn't make a sandwich because he'd forgotten to buy bread.
The hotel was full, so I was glad that we'd booked in advance.
My new job wasn't exactly what I’d expected.

Try this exercise to test your grammar.

Grammar test 1

Grammar B1-B2: Past perfect: 1

Read the explanation to learn more.

Grammar explanation

Time up to a point in the past

We use the past perfect simple (had + past participle) to talk about time up to a certain point in the past.

She'd published her first poem by the time she was eight. 
We'd finished all the water before we were halfway up the mountain.
Had the parcel arrived when you called yesterday?

Past perfect for the earlier of two past actions

We can use the past perfect to show the order of two past events. The past perfect shows the earlier action and the past simple shows the later action.

When the police arrived, the thief had escaped.

It doesn't matter in which order we say the two events. The following sentence has the same meaning.

The thief had escaped when the police arrived.

Note that if there's only a single event, we don't use the past perfect, even if it happened a long time ago.

The Romans spoke Latin. (NOT The Romans had spoken Latin.)

Past perfect with before

We can also use the past perfect followed by before to show that an action was not done or was incomplete when the past simple action happened.

They left before I'd spoken to them.
Sadly, the author died before he'd finished the series.

Adverbs

We often use the adverbs already (= 'before the specified time'), still (= as previously), just (= 'a very short time before the specified time'), ever (= 'at any time before the specified time') or never (= 'at no time before the specified time') with the past perfect. 

I called his office but he'd already left.
It still hadn't rained at the beginning of May.
I went to visit her when she'd just moved to Berlin.
It was the most beautiful photo I'd ever seen.
Had you ever visited London when you moved there?
I'd never met anyone from California before I met Jim.

Do this exercise to test your grammar again.

Grammar test 2

Grammar B1-B2: Past perfect: 2

 

Language level

Intermediate: B1

Comments

Dear Sir,

What is the difference between the following three phrases?
"Call to me"
"Call unto me"
"Call me"
Thank you,
Regards,
kingson

Hello kingson

If you haven't already, the first thing I'd recommend is that you carefully study example sentences in the dictionary. As you can see there, this verb has quite a few different meanings. 'Call me', by the far the most common of the three you ask about, can therefore mean quite a few different things which you can see perfectly well in the dictionary.

It's difficult for me to imagine all possible situations in which one might say 'Call to me', but in general I'd say it is a way of giving instructions to someone to get my attention at some point in time.

'Call unto me' is not really used outside of very specific contexts any more. You might find it in a passage from an older translation of the Bible, for example, but it would be quite unusual to hear or read it in most places nowadays.

All the best

Kirk

The LearnEnglish Team

Hello kingson

1 - We always use 'to' after 'listen' when it has an object. I wouldn't recommend looking for a logical reason for this -- it's just the way English has come to be spoken. Since 'listen' has an object ('me') in 2, 2 is not correct. Instead it should be 1.

'ask' is different; it is not followed by a preposition and so we say 'ask me' instead of 3 (which is incorrect). As for 4, the difference is that the first is correct and the second is not!

All natural languages have irregular forms, though of course native speakers don't usually recognise them as such. I've only studied a handful of languages, but I'd say English has more than most!

All the best

Kirk

The LearnEnglish Team

Dear Sir,
I have asked few questions on the following sentence and got excellent answers from you. But I still have a question on the same sentence.

" My friend got married (past time reference) to a girl who had been working here in this office".(The girl is currently working in the same office)
If I use past perfect (had been working), it works well with time reference(past tense- got married). But it ignores that the girl still works in the same office.
So please let me know which way I can form this sentence better.
Thank you,
Regards,
kingson

Hello Kingson,

If the girl works in the office now then a present simple is the most obvious choice:

My friend got married to a girl who works here in this office.

Of course, this does not tell us that the girl worked in the office when your friend got married, though that would be the most likely way to understand the sentence. If you needed to make it explicit, then you would need to add the information separately:

My friend got married to a girl who worked here in this office. She still works here.

My friend got married to a girl from this office. She still works here.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Dear Peter,
Thank you very much for your service. It's really throwing light on some darker areas. Have a happy New year.
Regards,
kingson

Dear Sir,

"Since you were honest to me, I have chosen you as my secretary".

Here, there is a past tense and a present perfect in a sentence. Is the sentence correct with these two tenses together? Does the past tense plays an adverbial function here in this sentence?
Thank you,
Regards,
kingson

Hello Kingson,

The sentence is perfectly correct. It describes an action in the near past which has a present result (choosing) and provides a completed past action (being honest) which provided the motivation for this action.

The sentence has two clauses which are joined by a subordinating conjunction (since). The conjunction expresses a causal relatioship in a similar way to 'because'.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Dear Peter,
That's an excellent answer. Thank you so much for that.
Please find the following sentences.
I thought (past tense)you did not work(past tense) here. (But the person is currently working here)
I thought (past tense)you do not work (present tense)here. (But the person is currently working here)
Which is right ? and why?
In the similar way please find the following sentences.
I thought you have resigned the job (but the person is still in the same job)
I thought you had resigned the job (but the person is still in the same job)

Is the clause "I thought" is a near past tense to the rest of the sentence?

I know my question is bit vague but I believe your answer will throw light on what I want to achieve.
Thank you,
Regards,
kingson

Dear Teacher,

This is about articles and making a generalization ( in this case "bank"). I would like to know if there is any difference in the meaning of the following sentences or if they have the same meaning. Could you also tell me which one is more appropriate?
1. People go to a bank to deposit money
2. People go to banks to deposit money

Thank you.

Pages