Robot teachers

Read an article about robot teachers to practise and improve your reading skills.


Do the preparation task first. Then read the text and do the exercises.

Reading text

If you think of the jobs robots could never do, you would probably put doctors and teachers at the top of the list. It's easy to imagine robot cleaners and factory workers, but some jobs need human connection and creativity. But are we underestimating what robots can do? In some cases, they already perform better than doctors at diagnosing illness. Also, some patients might feel more comfortable sharing personal information with a machine than a person. Could there be a place for robots in education after all?

British education expert Anthony Seldon thinks so. And he even has a date for the robot takeover of the classroom: 2027. He predicts robots will do the main job of transferring information and teachers will be like assistants. Intelligent robots will read students' faces, movements and maybe even brain signals. Then they will adapt the information to each student. It's not a popular opinion and it's unlikely robots will ever have empathy and the ability to really connect with humans like another human can.

One thing is certain, though. A robot teacher is better than no teacher at all. In some parts of the world, there aren't enough teachers and 9–16 per cent of children under the age of 14 don't go to school. That problem could be partly solved by robots because they can teach anywhere and won't get stressed, or tired, or move somewhere for an easier, higher-paid job.

Those negative aspects of teaching are something everyone agrees on. Teachers all over the world are leaving because it is a difficult job and they feel overworked. Perhaps the question is not 'Will robots replace teachers?' but 'How can robots help teachers?' Office workers can use software to do things like organise and answer emails, arrange meetings and update calendars. Teachers waste a lot of time doing non-teaching work, including more than 11 hours a week marking homework. If robots could cut the time teachers spend marking homework and writing reports, teachers would have more time and energy for the parts of the job humans do best.



Language level

Average: 4.1 (29 votes)
Do you need to improve your English reading skills?
Join thousands of learners from around the world who are improving their English reading skills with our online courses.

Submitted by Dariusz on Mon, 13/09/2021 - 00:45

In some cases it would be good to have a robot as a teacher: like more comfortable, less pressure, but there's need to study by psychologists of negative aspects this perform. No empathy isn't looking good.
Profile picture for user iEdd

Submitted by iEdd on Wed, 21/07/2021 - 17:33

Absolutely not. I've beed a teacher and I know how to feel about that. Human relationships are based on empahty and respect. Sort of feelings a robot will never live. I disagree in the main role in a classroom, but I support the idea of robots can helps with marks and reports.
Profile picture for user Rafaela1

Submitted by Rafaela1 on Sun, 11/07/2021 - 13:43

Partially agree. :)

Submitted by GiulianaAndy on Sat, 10/07/2021 - 21:58

Yes, I would like to have a robot as a teacher because I think they do not get angrry when I want to ask a question. In addition to that, they know so many different things, so I would learn more things from a robot. If I had a robot as a teacher, I would not have to worry if that class is below standars because I know robots give us a lot knoweledge and information more than a human brain can give us. The only disadvantage would be that they do not have the empathy to connect with humans like another human can.

Submitted by Rano on Wed, 17/03/2021 - 07:34

I like if can have one robet.,help me in homework and shopping

Submitted by ahmad 920 on Wed, 10/03/2021 - 14:29

Hi, Question what is the different between 'think of' or 'think -without preposition-' or 'think about' for example in the beginning in this article it say "If you think of the jobs robots could never do," can we say "if you think the jobs ..." and it give us the same meaning? thanks in advance
Profile picture for user Peter M.

Submitted by Peter M. on Thu, 11/03/2021 - 07:10

In reply to by ahmad 920


Hi ahmad 920,

We use 'think of...' to mean 'imagine' (1) or 'consider' (2):

(1) Think of your a number, but don't tell me it.

(2) Think of the jobs robots could never do.

We can also use 'think about' with the second meaning.


We do no use 'think' with a noun as a direct object after it, so 'Think jobs...' is incorrect.


A good dictionary will provide you with this information and more. For example:




The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by German on Tue, 02/03/2021 - 03:12

No, I wouldn't. I think that that never will happen, but is possible that the robots help in the future to the teachers in some activities like to prepare que classes and check exams. Althought the artifical intelligence is advancing I think that the robots never will could undestand the behaviours or the emotions of the students.

Submitted by AulianFr on Mon, 01/03/2021 - 16:55

As stated in the text, a robot cannot possess empathy or any other mental connection with other humans. I would hate it if my teacher is just teaching me and never ask how I am doing or even try to look me in the eyes trying to understand me. Socializing is one important part of teaching, therefore replacing teachers with robots sounds really unnecessary and even could impose a threat to our education system. I imagine if our schools are being taken over by robots, then our children would not be able to communicate with others in real life