Do the preparation task first. Then read the text and do the exercises.
In 2010, the planetary defence team at NASA had identified and logged 90 per cent of the asteroids near Earth measuring 1km wide. These 'near-Earth objects', or NEOs, are the size of mountains and include anything within 50 million kilometres of Earth's orbit. With an estimated 50 left to log, NASA says none of the 887 it knows about are a significant danger to the planet.
Now NASA is working towards logging some of the smaller asteroids, those measuring 140 metres wide or more. Of the 25,000 estimated asteroids of this size, so far about 8,000 have been logged, leaving 17,000 unaccounted for. Considering that a 19-metre asteroid that exploded above the city of Chelyabinsk in Russia in 2013 injured 1,200 people, these middle-sized asteroids would be a serious danger if they enter Earth's orbit.
Whether NASA can find the remaining middle-sized NEOs depends on getting the money to build NEOCam, a 0.5-metre space telescope which would use infrared light to locate asteroids. If it did get the money, it could probably achieve its goal in ten years. Once logged, the planetary defence team would still need to work out how to defend the planet against being hit by the truly worrying asteroids – the PHAs.
'Potentially Hazardous Asteroids' are rocks close enough to pass within 7.5 million kilometres of Earth's orbit. NASA has created a map of 1,400 PHAs, none of which are expected to be a threat in the next one hundred years. With technology already available, NASA can track these objects and make predictions about possible impact, at which point two defence solutions could be launched.
The first is DART – the Double Asteroid Redirection Test. Plans are scheduled to test DART on the moon of an asteroid called Didymos. 'Didymoon' is 150 metres wide, orbiting its 800-metre mother, and hopefully the impact of DART will knock it out of its orbit enough for Earth-based telescopes to pick up.
Another suggested defence against a PHA on course to hit Earth is to blow it up using a nuclear weapon. It may sound like a plot from a film, and it was the subject of the 1998 film Armageddon, but the Hypervelocity Asteroid Mitigation Mission for Emergency Response (HAMMER) is a genuine NASA proposal. The eight-ton rockets would be fired at an approaching asteroid with the hope of bumping it off course. If the asteroid was too close to Earth for this plan to work, the rockets would carry nuclear bombs to blow it up instead.
For the first question in the task 2, I don't understand why the answer is 'true'. The text says ' With an estimated 50 left to log, NASA says none of the 887 it knows about are a significant danger to the planet.' about asteroids that measure 1km wide.So, we don't know anything about 50 asteroids that measures 1 km wide. So, earth 'might' be in danger.
The question says "Earth does not appear to be in any danger ...". "Appear" means "to be seen" (by somebody), so the question is asking whether any signs of danger have been observed or perceived (by the team at NASA).
It is not asking whether danger really exists, in an objective sense (which it might, as you pointed out). That's a different question.
Does that make sense?
Assuming that the asteroid is big and close enough to bring about a devastating impact that can affect the whole planet but it still takes some time to finally hit it, my choice depends on the situation, as an earlier comment said (by Lollipop). If I were far away from my parents and relatives, I would find a way to get where they are and share my remaining lifetime with them. I would also remember all the moments we lived together. Another goofy thing I'd do is to tell my crush that I've been in love with her since I knew her by WhatsApp. Despite it's the worst moment of my life, it's somehow one of the best ones since we don't care anymore about meaningless things but staying with the people who accompanied us almost all of our lives.
Hello, In Task 1 question 3; why the answer is 'D' ? The text says 'none of which are expected to be a threat in the next one hundred years.' so there's nothing about asteroids that are the biggest danger to Earth in paragraph D, is there ? Thank you.
Although none of the asteroids in paragraph D are expected to be a threat in the next 100 years, they are potential dangers as they pass relatively close to our orbit. The rest of the asteroids do not come close to our orbit and so are not even potential threats. Thus, the biggest threats are those in paragraph D.
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello. For the first question in the task 2, I don't understand why the answer is 'true'. The text says ' With an estimated 50 left to log, NASA says none of the 887 it knows about are a significant danger to the planet.' about asteroids that measure 1km wide.So, we don't know anything about 50 asteroids that measures 1 km wide. So, earth 'might' be in danger.
The question does not ask if we are absolutely sure we are safe but rather if 'we appear to be' in significant danger. Given that 887 have been checked and found to be safe and that only 50 remain (presumably the ones which were less of a priority), I think it is correct to say that we do not appear to be in significant danger, even if a small chance remains.
The LearnEnglish Team
Depends on the possible results of the impact given by the NASA.... If it is life- threatening for me I definately would say my farewells to my loved ones and find out if there is a possibility to stay alive. Other then that.... I can't say and I can only hope not to experience something like that.
In task 2,q1 if only "Earth does not appear to be in any danger from any asteroids" was given, will the answer be not given?
Yes, I think so!
The LearnEnglish Team